|
|
THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s
DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual
Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
Over
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
The
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
Diagnostic Features
The
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to
individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those
who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of
another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
.
. .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to
have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions
but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may
further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional
or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the
infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not
report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny
having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it
follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially
impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual
sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior
constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual
sadism (by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their
paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress,
harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
"Recurrent"
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
  
What the Babylonian Talmud says about the
worship of Molech: Mishnah. He
who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to
Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no
penalty, unless he does both.
Gemara.
The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi)
Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the
view that Molech worship is not idolatry.
Informing
on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:
Mesira
in Modern Times
(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah
Zarah, Folio 26b)
Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*
The S. Daniel Abraham &
Ira L. Rennert
Torah Ethics Project
The Orthodox Caucus
Toronto, Canada
Netivot HaTorah
Day School
October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.
Even
though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even
imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a
number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular
government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even
when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s)
substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in
effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such
a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs
on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to prevent
him from informing, even without a formal court ruling.
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976
audiobook murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear Youtube interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked
about the Ashkenazi Jewish plan to take over the United States and the world.
The Lost
Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not
the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and
has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)
Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim: This
is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK or
Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including
children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish
crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.
http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html
Conspiracy of Silence – Banned Documentary: (click on any
photo to see Youtube video)
Conspiracy
of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex abuse
and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring
intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly
decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy
of Silence reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government have been
involved in systematic child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base
desires of key politicians.
Paul Bonacci: The Murder [1985 --
GRAPHIC! click on photos below to see Youtube
video)
Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from
Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House
and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the
White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced
to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the
unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus
bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being
raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish
politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.
Larry King: Overachiever
Editor’s
Note: Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was
tasked with silencing those involved. He turned to the CIA.
The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy”
operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys
Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington
and New York primarily.
http://come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html
Click
on the two photos above to see video.
Israel’s
first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp and one of many
whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to force beautiful,
delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who have been tricked
and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and then forced to part
with their virginity and gang raped every night by sexually perverted Israeli
and Arab men.
·
How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;
·
Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;
·
Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;
·
NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;
·
11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;
·
CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish ...;
·
New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza
B'peh;
·
New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;
·
Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...
Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?
Talmudic Jews
'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to
Serve
Us as Slaves'
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25):
(Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah
is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.
R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came
forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for
Blackface Costume
By Sonia Kennebeck,
CNN
Tue February 26, 2013
Story Highlights
Brooklyn
Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a
Purim party.
He
apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was
not the intention."
One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a
beginning" but inadequate.
Yair Netanyahu’s Night of
Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell Recordings: Younger Netanyahu heard asking his
friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for strippers, saying he owed him for
$20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on photo to hear Yair
audiotape)
“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah
Winfrey Show Discussing “Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her
to Ashkenazi Jewish Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see
Youtube video).
The
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of
the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race,
financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all
junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political,
religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless
they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite
for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left
unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff
addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_63_will_attorneys_sign_affirmation_files/image130.png)
Ashkenazi
sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being
to death.
https://youtu.be/Mg_13WJ4gDo;
https://youtu.be/MtKBjPxGmyc
JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND
LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING
Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther
King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v.
T.D. Loyd Jowers and
Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.
Yemeni
child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman
Adult
child with biological mother
Israel
Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)
Israeli
schoolchildren dressed up as the burning
Twin
Towers. Costume won best prize.
Countries
that lost citizens on 9/11:
http://brilliantmaps.com/9-11-victims;
Israel
Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo
to
see Youtube video)
9/11
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on
photo
to see Youtube video)
![WTC Falling Death2[3]](chapter_63_will_attorneys_sign_affirmation_files/image198.png)
 
 
|
The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one
Jehovah.”
שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד
“Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of
Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face
against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he
has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and
has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately
close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech
and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face
against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people
along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.
 ![Jew whipping slave[6]](chapter_63_will_attorneys_sign_affirmation_files/image296.png)     
      
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Chapter 63:
Will Attorneys
Sign Affirmation?
Will Immigration
Professionals Sign Affirmation --
Or Will They Conspire to Hide Allen
Kaye's Crimes?
|
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
|
|
Cheryl
D. Uzamere
Plaintiff,
- against -
Allen E. Kaye, P.C.; Uzamere and
Associates, PLLC; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP;
Allen E. Kaye Esq.; Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq.; Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; Jack Gladstein, Esq.; Eugenia Cowles,
Esq.; Rachel McCarthy, Esq.; Andrew Cuomo, Esq.; Honorable Michael
Bloomberg; Honorable A. Gail Prudenti, Justice
of the Appellate Court 2nd Judicial Department; Honorable
Abraham Gerges, Justice of the Supreme Court,
Kings County; Honorable Jeffrey
S. Sunshine, Justice of Supreme Court Kings County;
James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of Appellate Court 2nd
Judicial Department; Joseph Visceglia,
Municipal Clerk; Bernard J. Rostansky, Notary
Public; State of New York; City of New York and New York City Clerk's
Office
Defendants.
|
|
Civil Court Docket No: ___________
AFFIRMATION
|
|
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF KINGS )
ss:
I, Allen E. Kaye,
an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the courts of the State of
New York, hereby affirm the following under penalties of perjury:
1) I am the owner and principal
attorney of the law firm Allen E. Kaye, P.C., located at 233 Broadway,
New York, New York, 10006. I am fully familiar with the facts and
circumstances contained in the subject Affirmation. My knowledge and
information are based on the records maintained by my office,
communications with the individual photographed in Exhibit A and with
other individuals with whom I discussed issues as they pertain to
this case.
2) I recognize that the Plaintiff in
the above-entitled action, in an attempt to apprise American citizens and
to protect them from the dangers associated with corrupt immigration
attorneys and immigrants who engage in green card marriage scams and
other forms of immigration fraud, has uploaded the subject Affirmation to
her website, http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com.
3) I affirm that the statements herein
presented are true and correct, and that I am wholly and solely responsible
for any negative consequence to my career, my professional reputation and
Plaintiff's perception of green card marriages as outlined on Plaintiff's
web page http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com/end_green_card_marriage_sponsorship.html that include,
but are not limited to: investigations conducted against me by
governmental agencies, arrest, imprisonment, disbarment, suspension,
censure, subpoenas, lawsuits, federal or state court's decision against
me regarding any acts of fraud, omissions or other acts of impropriety,
and any other damages arising from my intentional misrepresentation of
the facts as contained in the subject Affirmation.
4) That the individual photographed in
Exhibit A is my client.
5) That before November 30, 1979, neither
I nor anyone in my employ was retained to provide legal services on
behalf of the individual photographed in Exhibit A, nor did I collect
monies or provide pro bono legal services on behalf of the individual
photographed in Exhibit A.
6) That neither the United States
Citizenship and Immigration Service nor any other federal agency is in
possession of records that reflect that I provided legal services on
behalf of the individual photographed in Exhibit A before November 30,
1979.
7) That before November 30, 1979,
neither I, nor anyone in my employ knew the individual photographed in
Exhibit A by his real name or any other name.
8) That on or around November 30,
1979, the individual photographed in Exhibit A came into my office for
the first time and met with an attorney associated with Mr. Kaye...in
connection with a petition for an immediate relative as outlined in
correspondence prepared by Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel of the USCIS (see
Exhibit B).
9) That the individual photographed in
Exhibit A presented to the attorney associated with Mr. Kaye a copy of
his marriage license or other identification as proof of marriage to
Cheryl D. Uzamere, formerly known as Cheryl D. Duncan (see Exhibit C).
10) That the individual to whom USCIS'
statement an attorney associated with Mr. Kaye's firm refers is Harvey
Shapiro, as indicated by Mr. Shapiro's signature above my law firm's name
on the I-130 that was signed by the Plaintiff (see Exhibit D pages 1-4).
11) That on or around November 30, 1979,
the individual photographed in Exhibit A presented marriage documentation
containing the fictitious name Godwin E. Uzamere.
12) That on or around November 30, 1979,
Plaintiff signed her maiden name on the aforesaid immigration form
without knowing that my associate Harvey Shapiro had accepted her
husband's fictitious name Godwin E. Uzamere as true and correct.
13) That on or around November 30, 1979,
that my associate Harvey Shapiro did not verify the identity of the
individual photographed in Exhibit A by viewing the aforesaid
individual's passport, driver's license, college identification, birth
papers, baptismal certificate or other official and accurate
documentation as required by New York State and U.S. immigration laws, as
outlined in Exhibit E (page 2 of 2); and that Harvey Shapiro failed to
properly verify the identity of the individual photographed in Exhibit A;
and that having placed supervisory responsibilities for the processing of
the aforesaid individual's request for permanent residence with Harvey
Shapiro, I had no further involvement with the individual photographed in
Exhibit A with regard to his petition for immediate relative sponsorship
through the Plaintiff.
14) That with regard to having placed
supervisory responsibilities for the processing of the aforesaid
individual's request for permanent residence with Harvey Shapiro,
existing laws of agency or other commercial laws holding a company's
principal is liable for the acts of his/her agents, necessarily requiring
me to ensure that my associate Harvey Shapiro's processing of the
aforesaid individual's request for permanent residence was true and
correct, did not apply to me at the time that Harvey Shapiro submitted
the falsified I-130 form to be notarized.
15) That I recognize that as a direct
result of Harvey Shapiro's processing the request of the individual
photographed in Exhibit A with the fraudulent information Godwin E.
Uzamere, date of birth, June 1, 1955, and as a direct of Harvey Shapiro
failure to check the aforesaid individual's passport, driver's license,
college identification, birth papers, baptismal certificate or other
official and accurate documentation as required by New York State and
U.S. immigration laws, and outlined in Exhibit E (page 2 of 2), Plaintiff
was unable to obtain child and spousal support for the life of the
marriage.
16) That I affirm that the names Ehigie
Edobor Uzamere and Godwin E. Uzamere belong to Senator Ehigie Edobor
Uzamere; and that said individual is the Plaintiff's husband.
17) That the affirmation of Eugene O.
Uzamere, Esq., regarding the identity of the individual photographed in
Exhibit A is fraudulent, inaccurate and without merit (see Exhibit F
(pages 1, 2).
18) That as the owner and principal of
the law firm Allen E. Kaye, P.C., I have never engaged in any form of
willful blindness, such as intentionally placing supervisory
responsibilities on associates, subordinates or other agents in my employ
to process fraudulent immigration request so that I can feign lack of
knowledge.
19) That I submit this Affirmation
willingly and with no explicit, implicit or coerced understanding that if
I place blame on Harvey Shapiro or on an as yet unknown agent, the
Plaintiff will end her complaints against me in exchange for my
influencing the judge in Plaintiff's divorce action to grant her motion
for default judgment and money judgment against her husband.
20) That I submit this Affirmation
knowing that the Plaintiff believes me to be wholly and solely liable for
the acts of my associate, Harvey Shapiro based on her understanding of
the laws of agency; that Plaintiff cannot legally or logically accede to
any explicit, implicit, coerced or other understood request allowing me
to place blame on former agency Harvey Shapiro insofar as Plaintiff would
consider such an act to be dishonest; and that such an act would leave
Plaintiff open to lawsuit by me based on defamation of character.
21) That I am willing to go forward to
hold former associate Harvey Shapiro liable for submitting the I-130
signed by the Plaintiff and to assist in Harvey Shapiro's prosecution.
22) I understand that if I refuse to sign
this Affirmation as presented by the Plaintiff that Plaintiff will use my
refusal as proof that I am guilty of the allegations for which I stand
accused.
WHEREFORE, as Harvey
Shapiro is responsible for the processing of the aforesaid I-130 form in
a manner that is inconsistent with New York State and U.S. laws that
require the production of verifiable identification, and that Harvey
Shapiro's processing of the fraudulent I-130 form on behalf of the
Plaintiff's husband is the proximate cause for the loss of income to
Plaintiff and her children, I respectfully submit that this court direct
its investigation to Harvey Shapiro for litigation, prosecution and for
other and further actions as to this Court seem just and proper.
Dated: Brooklyn, NY
January 10, 2009
____________________________
Allen E. Kaye, Esq.
Allen E. Kaye, P.C.
233 Broadway, New York, NY 10006
Tel.: (212) 964-5858
Fax.: (212) 608-3734
|
|
|
|
Affirmation of Michael Chertoff,
Secretary, USDHS
Affidavit of Michael Aytes,
Acting Deputy Director, USCIS
Affirmation of Rachel McCarthy, Bar
Counsel, USDHS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
|
|
Cheryl D. Uzamere
Plaintiff,
- against –
Allen E. Kaye, P.C.; Uzamere and
Associates, PLLC; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson,
LLP; Allen E. Kaye Esq.; Eugene O.
Uzamere, Esq.; Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; Jack Gladstein,
Esq.; Eugenia Cowles, Esq.; Rachel McCarthy, Esq.; Andrew Cuomo, Esq.;
Honorable Michael Bloomberg; Honorable A. Gail Prudenti,
Justice of the Appellate Court 2nd Judicial Department; Honorable Abraham
Gerges, Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings
County; Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine, Justice of Supreme Court Kings
County; James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of Appellate Court 2nd
Judicial Department; Joseph Visceglia,
Municipal Clerk; Bernard J. Rostansky, Notary
Public; State of New York; City of New York and New York City Clerk's
Office
Defendants.
|
|
Civil
Court Docket No:_____________
AFFIRMATION
|
|
STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF KINGS ) ss:
I, Rachel McCarthy,
an attorney duly admitted to practice law in the courts of the State
of Vermont and in the federal courts of the United States, hereby
affirm the following under penalties of perjury:
1) I am Bar Counsel for the United
States Department of Homeland Security. As such, I have represented
the aforesaid federal agency in several disciplinary proceedings; many
ending with the censuring, suspending or expulsion of attorneys
found to have violated the Rules of Ethics for Professional Conduct of
Immigration Practitioners. I am fully familiar with the facts
and circumstances contained in the subject Affirmation. My knowledge and
information is based on: the records maintained by my agency concerning
the individual photographed in Exhibit
A and known to my agency as Ehigie
Edobor Uzamere; communications with immigration practitioner Allen
E. Kaye, Esq.; communications with immigration practitioner Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; and communications with USCIS
employees with whom I have discussed issues that pertain to the
decision I rendered in the correspondence that I sent to Plaintiff Cheryl
D. Uzamere dated January 6, 2009(see Exhibit B).
2) I recognize that the Plaintiff in
the above-entitled action, in an attempt to apprise American citizens and
to protect them from the dangers associated with corrupt immigration
attorneys, immigrants and federal employees who
engage in green card marriage scams and other forms of immigration fraud,
has uploaded the subject Affirmation to her website, http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.com.
3) I affirm that the statements herein
presented are true and correct, and that I am wholly and solely
responsible for any negative consequence to my career
and professional reputation that include, but are not limited
to: investigations conducted against me by governmental agencies, arrest,
imprisonment, disbarment, suspension, censure, subpoenas, lawsuits,
federal or state court's decisions against me regarding any acts of
fraud, omissions or other acts of impropriety, and any other damages
arising from my intentional misrepresentation of the facts as contained
in the subject Affirmation.
4) That although the Rules of Ethics for Professional Conduct of
Immigration Practitioners prohibits immigration attorneys from "knowingly
or with reckless disregard makes a false statement or willfully
misleading, misinforming, threatening, or deceiving any person",
that Exhibit D, page 1, the I-130 relative sponsorship form that
contains the fraudulent name and birth date that Plaintiff's
husband used to marry the Plaintiff and is endorsed with Mr. Kaye's name
is not clear and convincing evidence of an ethical violation on the
part of Mr. Kaye.
5) That although the Law of Agency places
liability of an agent's acts or omissions on the principal, I do not find
clear and convincing evidence of an ethical violation of the Rules on the
part of Mr. Kaye, who supervised and received money based on the
work performed by his agent, Harvey Shapiro.
6) That my statement: "the
acts that you allege...occurred in the course of representation by an
attorney associated with Mr. Kaye" refers to Harvey Shapiro, as
indicated by Mr. Shapiro's signature immediate above Mr. Kaye's name
in Exhibit D page 1.
7) That the individual photographed in
Exhibit A is known to my agency as "Ehigie Edobor
Uzamere", date of birth December 31, 1960; and that my agency's
records reflect that the aforesaid individual produced documentation in
the aforesaid name to verify his identity.
8) That my agency is not in possession
of any records that reflect that Allen E. Kaye, P.C. provided
legal services on behalf of the individual photographed in Exhibit A
before November 30, 1979.
9) That my agency's
records reflect that on or around November 30, 1979, the individual
photographed in Exhibit A retained the legal services of
Allen E. Kaye for the first time.
10) That on or around November 30, 1979,
my agency's records reflect that the Plaintiff's husband met with an
attorney associated with Mr. Kaye...in connection with a petition for an
immediate relative as I stated in Exhibit B, my letter
to the Plaintiff dated January 6, 2009.
11) That on or around November 30, 1979,
the individual photographed in Exhibit A, and known as
"Ehigie E. Uzamere" in my agency's records, presented Allen
Kaye's agent Harvey Shapiro with marriage documentation containing the
fictitious name Godwin E. Uzamere, date of birth June 1, 1955.
12) That my agency contains no
photocopies of official documentation that contain the
fraudulent information "Godwin E. Uzamere, date of birth June, 1955 as outlined in Exhibit E, page 2 of 2, marriage affidavit's classifications for
official identification.
13) That my agency's records reflect that
on or around November 30, 1979, Plaintiff signed her maiden name on the
aforesaid immigration form that contained the fraudulent information
"Godwin Edobor Uzamere, date of birth June 1, 1955"; and that
said form was signed by Allen Kaye's agent, Harvey Shapiro and endorsed
with Allen Kaye's name.
14) That on or around December
17, 1979, Allen Kaye's agent Harvey Shapiro presented the
I-130 relative sponsorship form he fraudulently completed to Bernard J. Rostansky to be notarized; that Bernard Rostansky did not verify the identity of the
individual photographed in Exhibit A by viewing the aforesaid
individual's passport, driver's license, college identification, birth
papers, baptismal certificate or other official and accurate
documentation as as outlined in Exhibit E,
page 2 of 2, back of marriage affidavit.
15) That my agency eventually withdrew
the IR2 permanent residence of Plaintiff's husband Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
because Mr. Uzamere was married to the Plaintiff at the time he became
eligible; that IR2 residence is granted to immigrants who are no more
than 21 years of age and unmarried, as outlined by my report to Eugenia
Cowles, Exhibit B2, in which I stated that "Uzamere later obtained
status via his USC stepmother and that law firm was retained AFTER the filing
of the petition after there had been no action for a year.
16) That my agency had prior knowledge
of Plaintiff's husband act of fraud insofar as my agency was able to
ascertain that the fictitious information "Godwin Ehigie Uzamere,
date of birth June 1, 1955" who requested permanent residence based
on marriage to the Plaintiff is the same individual known
as Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, date of birth, December 31, 1960 who
requested permanent residence based on being under 21 years
of age and unmarried.
17) That in the nearly thirty years since
November 30, 1979, my agency did not apprise the Plaintiff of
withdrawal of her husband's fraudulent request for permanent residence;
that my agency did not apprise the Plaintiff that the information
provided to it by Allen Kaye's agent Harvey Shapiro was fraudulent.
18) That my agency did not provide the
Plaintiff with information regarding her husband's identity until my
agency charged her with assault after the Plaintiff left several angry
messages demanding that Allen Kaye be investigated for acts of fraud
related to Plaintiff's husband's fraudulent request for permanent
residence.
19) That I recognize that as a direct
result of my agency's failure to apprise the Plaintiff of
her husband's fraudulent request for permanent residence that was
processed by Allen Kaye's agent Harvey Shapiro, the Plaintiff was unable
to obtain child and spousal support for the entire lifetime of the
marriage.
20) That I recognize the affirmation of
Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq., regarding the identity of the individual
photographed in Exhibit A is fraudulent, inaccurate and without
merit (see Exhibit F (pages 1 and 2).
21) That I submit this Affirmation
willingly and with no explicit, implicit or coerced understanding that if
I place blame on Harvey Shapiro or on an as yet unknown agent instead of
myself, my agency and Allen Kaye, the Plaintiff will waive her
constitutional right to seek redress from the government with regard to
her federal lawsuit in exchange for my ability to influence the
judge in Plaintiff's divorce action to grant her motion for default
judgment and money judgment against her husband.
22) That I submit this Affirmation
knowing that the Plaintiff believes me and my agency to be liable for
the acts of Harvey Shapiro, insofar as my agency failed
to apprise the Plaintiff that Allen Kaye's agent Harvey Shapiro
processed a fraudulently completed I-130 relative sponsorship form; and
that in spite of my agency's prior knowledge, it withheld said
knowledge from the Plaintiff, forcing Plaintiff to be unable to
obtain legally-mandated child and spousal support from her husband.
23) I understand that Plaintiff
cannot legally or logically accede to any explicit, implicit, coerced or
other understood request allowing me to place blame on Allen Kaye's agent
Harvey Shapiro, and not myself, my agency or Allen Kaye, insofar as
Plaintiff would consider such an act to be dishonest; and that such an
act would leave Plaintiff open to lawsuit based on defamation of
character.
24) That I am willing to hold Harvey
Shapiro criminally liable and to assist in his prosecution for
submitting the I-130 that was signed by the Plaintiff, based on my
statement that "The acts that you allege...occurred in the
course of representation of an attorney associated with Mr. Kaye"; said
representation referring to Harvey Shapiro "in connection with a
petition for an immediate relative filed by [Cheryl D. Uzamere] with
the Immigration and Naturalization in 1979."
25) I understand that if I refuse to sign
this Affirmation as presented by the Plaintiff that Plaintiff will use my
refusal as proof that I am guilty of the allegations for which I stand
accused.
WHEREFORE, as Harvey
Shapiro is responsible for the processing of the aforesaid I-130 form in
a manner that is inconsistent with New York State and U.S. laws that
require the production of verifiable identification, and that Harvey
Shapiro's processing of the fraudulent I-130 form on behalf of the
Plaintiff's husband is the proximate cause for the loss of income to
Plaintiff and her children, I respectfully submit that this court direct
its investigation to Harvey Shapiro for litigation, prosecution and for
other and further actions as to this Court seem just and proper.
Dated: Brooklyn, NY
January 10, 2009
____________________________
Rachel McCarthy, Esq.
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Service
70 Kimball Avenue
Room 103
South Burlington, VT
Tel.: (802) 660-5043
Fax.:(802) 660-5067
|
|
|
|
Affirmation of Thomas D. Anderson, U.S.
Attorney -- Vermont
Affirmation of Eugenia Cowles, U.S.
Assistant Attorney -- Vermont
Affirmation of Robert E. Juceam, Esq.,
Affirmation of Harvey Shapiro, Esq.
|
|
|
|
Exhibit A
(photographs of Senator Ehigie
Edobor Uzamere)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit B1
(Letter from Rachel McCarthy,
USCIS)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit B2
(Two-Uzamere Report from
Rachel McCarthy, USCIS)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit C
(marriage license)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit D
(I-130 for page 1 of 4)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit D
(Allen Kaye letter, 1st
page page 2 of 4)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit D
(Robert Juceam letter --
page 4 of 4)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit E
(marriage affidavit --
page 1 of 2)
|
|
|
|
Exhibit F
(Eugene's Affirmation --
page 1 of 2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
