THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS
OF SEXUAL SADISM
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual
Sadism Disorder Diagnostic
Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)
a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the
physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by
fantasies, urges, or behaviors.
individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or
the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or
impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.
diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals
who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny
any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another
individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.
. .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to
have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions
but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may
further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional
or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the
infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not
report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or
psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny
having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it
follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially
impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual
sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior
constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism
(by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their
paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress,
harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).
sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on
a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more
victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying
this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and
suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a
strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple
victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient
but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if
the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.
What the Babylonian Talmud says about the
worship of Molech: Mishnah. He
who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to
Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but
did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no
penalty, unless he does both.
The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi) Abin said:
Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not
on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:
in Modern Times
(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah
Zarah, Folio 26b)
Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*
The S. Daniel Abraham &
Ira L. Rennert Torah Ethics Project
The Orthodox Caucus
Netivot HaTorah Day School
October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.
though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even
imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a
number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular
government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even
when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s)
substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in
effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such
a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs
on others as a pursuer (a
rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing,
even without a formal court ruling.
The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976 audiobook
murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear Youtube
interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked about the Ashkenazi Jewish
plan to take over the United States and the world.
Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not
the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and
has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)
Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim:
This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK
or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including
children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish
crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.
Conspiracy of Silence – Banned Documentary: (click on any
photo to see Youtube video)
of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex
abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government.
Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war
veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how
rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic
child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.
Paul Bonacci: The Murder [1985 --
GRAPHIC! click on photos below to see Youtube video)
Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from
Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House
and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the
White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced
to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the
unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus
bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being
raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish
politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.
Larry King: Overachiever
Note: Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was
tasked with silencing those involved. He turned to the CIA.
The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy”
operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys
Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington
and New York primarily.
on the two photos above to see video.
first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp
and one of many whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to
force beautiful, delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who
have been tricked and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and
then forced to part with their virginity and gang raped every night by
sexually perverted Israeli and Arab men.
How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;
Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;
Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;
NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;
11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;
CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish ...;
New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza B'peh;
New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;
Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...
Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?
'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to
Us as Slaves'
Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293:
"AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25):
(Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah
is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e.
cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned.
R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came
forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation.
N.Y. State Lawmaker Apologizes
for Blackface Costume
By Sonia Kennebeck, CNN
Tue February 26, 2013
Democrat Dov Hikind dressed in blackface for a Purim party.
apologized to "anyone who was offended" but added, "that was
not the intention."
One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a
beginning" but inadequate.
Yair Netanyahu’s Night of Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell
Netanyahu heard asking his friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for
strippers, saying he owed him for $20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on
photo to hear Yair audiotape)
“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah Winfrey Show Discussing
“Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her to Ashkenazi Jewish
Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see Youtube video).
Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the
victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for
Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is
demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as
sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including
non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping
members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like
the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved
force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race,
financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all
junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political,
religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless
they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite
for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left
unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff
addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.
sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being
JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND
LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING
Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther
King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v.
T.D. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.
child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman
child with biological mother
Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)
schoolchildren dressed up as the burning
Towers. Costume won best prize.
that lost citizens on 9/11:
Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo
see Youtube video)
Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on
to see Youtube video)
The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere
“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one
“Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of
Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring
to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face
against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he
has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and
has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately
close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech
and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face
against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people
along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.
Corruption at Nassau, Kings County Supreme
Courts and Nassau and Kings County Clerks' Offices
Will Gwendolyn Hatcher of Defendant New York State Attorney
General's Office continue the racist oppression of immigration/identity
fraud victim that has been allowed to happen unchallenged by
Administrative Judge Hinds-Radix, Administrative Judge Marano, Kings County Clerk of Court Nancy T. Sunshine
and Nassau County Clerk of Court Maureen O'Connell?
Oh yeah...it's been 30 days and Defendants Daily News
and Scott Shifrel have failed to interpose
an answer and response to immigration/identity fraud victim's Verified
Complaint and Notice to Admit
STATE OF NEW YORK
COURT OF CLAIMS
Cheryl D. Uzamere PROPOSED
- against -
State of New York*
I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, being
duly sworn, allege the following:
1) That the post office address of the Claimant is 1209
Loring Avenue, Apt. 6B, Brooklyn, New York, 11208.
2) That this claim arises from the illegal acts and
omissions of Defendant State of New York.
3) That the places where Claimant alleges the illegal
acts occurred are as follows: New York State Supreme Court, Nassau
County, 100 Supreme Court Drive, Mineola, New York, 11501, Nassau County
Clerk's Office 240 Old Country Road, Mineola, New York, 11501, New York
State Supreme Court Kings County, 360 Adams Street, Brooklyn, New York,
County of Kings and Kings County Clerk's Office, 360 Adams Street,
Brooklyn, New York, 11201.
4) That Claimant alleges that Defendant, by its employees
at the Nassau County Supreme Court, Nassau County Clerk's Office, Kings
County Supreme Court and Kings County Clerk's office deprived Claimant of
her civil and constitutional right to due process and inflicted great
mental and emotional damage on Claimant's person.
5) That Claimant asserts that Defendant's commission of
the illegal acts gives rise to the filing of an implied cause of action
in the manner of Brown v. State
of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223, 65 USLW
2355 (1996) and Bivens v. Six
Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
6) That on June 1, 2010, Claimant submitted her Poor
Person's Order, Amended Summons, Amended Verified Complaint, Statement of
Service by Mail, accompanying Acknowledgment and Notice to Admit; that
Defendant's employee(s) stamped as received the page of Claimant's
documents entitled Poor Person's Order and the page entitled Amended
Summons (see Exhibit A and B).
7) That Claimant asserts that she placed the correct
index number on her Poor Person's Order.
8) That on June 4, 2010, Claimant caused service of
process to be effected on defendants Daily News,
LP and Scott Shifrel (see Exhibit
9) That on June 4, 2010, Claimant served the Nassau
County Clerk's Office with affidavits of service for both defendants (see
Exhibit D, front and back and Exhibit
E front and back).
10) That the U.S. Postal Service's website reflects that
defendants Daily News, LP and Scott Shifrel
were served on June 7, 2010 (see Exhibit F and Exhibit
11) That from June 7, 2010 until the writing of this
Proposed Claim, defendants Daily News, LP, Scott Shifrel
have failed to interpose an answer and response to Claimant's Verified Complaint and
Notice to Admit.
12) That on or around June 24, 2010 Claimant received
Defendants' demand to change the place of trial (see Exhibit
13) That on Friday, July 2, 2010, with only five (5)
days remaining for defendants Daily News LP and Scott Shifrel
to interpose an answer and response to Claimant's Verified Complaint and
Notice to Admit, Claimant received an envelope from the Kings County
Clerk's Equity Department that contained a notice to make corrections and
the original affidavits of service that Defendant's employee previously
stamped as received on June 4, 2010 (see Exhibit
I and Exhibit J).
14) That Defendant's employee(s) erased the date received
stamp on the affidavit of service pertaining to Scott Shifrel;
and that Defendant's employee(s) crossed out the date stamps on the back
of both of Claimant's affidavits of service that Defendant's employee
previously stamped as received on June 4, 2010 (see Exhibit
D, back and Exhibit
15) That Claimant asserts that she has not received any
judgments from Defendant's judiciary employee the Honorable F. Dana
Winslow in response to Daily News, LP's and Scott Shifrel's
motion to change venue pursuant to CPLR 511(b), nor has Claimant been served
by Defendants with any notice of motion or corresponding attorney's
affirmation to change venue.
16) That Claimant alleges that Defendant's employees under
the care and control of Administrative Judge Anthony F. Marano, Administrative Judge Sylvia O. Hinds-Radix,
Kings County Clerk Nancy T. Sunshine and Nassau County Clerk Honorable
Maureen O'Connell illegally exhibited bias/preferential treatment toward
defendant Scott Shifrel by first refusing to
properly place a date stamp on the affidavit of service pertaining
to Scott Shifrel; then eventually placing a
date received stamp on both affidavits of service; then falsifying
Claimant's affidavits of service by removing the date received stamp that
Defendant's employee(s) originally affixed to the aforesaid documents and
finally removing the aforesaid original court documents from the court
and sending them back to Claimant without the date received stamp that
Defendant's employee(s) previously placed on Claimant's affidavits of
service on June 4, 2010.
17) That Claimant alleges that one of Defendant's reasons
for returning the falsified affidavits of service is to give the false
impression that Claimant failed to provide the court with proof of
service of defendants Daily News, LP and Scott Shifrel.
18) That Claimant alleges that another reason that Defendant
returned Claimant's affidavits of service with the dates removed is
to hide defendants Daily News, LP's and Scott Shifrel's
failure to interpose an answer and response to Claimant's Verified
Complaint and Notice to Admit in the thirty (30) days required by
the Summons that was served on the aforementioned defendants.
19) That Claimant alleges that Defendant's employees schemed
against Claimant by using the color of law/"authority" and
Claimant's fear of losing her case in court as artifices to deprive
Claimant of the intangible right of honest service; that Defendant's
employees attempted to dupe Claimant into believing that the notice from
Kings County Supreme Court's Equity Department was a directive requiring
Claimant to change venue that carries more legal weight than any judgment
from Judge F. Dana Winslow.
20) That Claimant's allegation that Defendant's employee's
falsification of Claimant's documents is on point is based on the date
stamp that Claimant found in the back of the affidavit of service
pertaining to Scott Shifrel; that Defendant's
employee(s) affixed the fictitious date of June 14, 2010, 4:20 a.m., a
time when Defendant's agency is not opened for business to the public.
21) That Claimant alleges that based on the notice that
Claimant received from the Kings County Clerk's Equity Department,
Defendant is illegally forcing Claimant to transfer her action to the
Kings County Supreme Court where she cannot obtain a fair trial based on
defendants' Daily News, LP and Scott Shifrel
publishing of a newspaper article that says Cheryl Uzamere, 50, known
around courthouse circles for her anti-Semitic screeds against judges...
(see Exhibit L).
22) That Defendant is illegally forcing Claimant to return
to the venue where Claimant has always been assigned a judge who is an
adherent of the Talmud, and who has rendered decisions against Claimant
although the defendants in Claimant's lawsuits have never interposed an
answer or filed an appearance pursuant to CPLR 320.
23) That Claimant asserts that Defendant violated 18 USC 1341,
mail fraud and other fraud offenses; 18 USC 1346,
definition of scheme or artifice to defraud ; 18 USC 241, conspiracy
against rights; 18 USC 242,
deprivation of rights under color of law; New York State
Penal Law 135.60, coercion in the second degree; New York State
Penal Law 135.65, coercion in the first degree; New York State
Constitution 6, due process of law; New York State
Constitution 11, equal protection under the law; U.S.
Constitution Fifth Amendment, due process of law and U.S.
Constitution Fourteenth Amendment, equal protection under the law.
24) That Claimant reasserts that Defendant's commission of
the aforesaid illegal acts gives rise to an implied cause of action
against the Defendant in the manner of Brown v.
State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223,
65 USLW 2355 (1996) and Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).
25) That Claimant respectfully prays that if this honorable
Court refuses Claimant's request to have her claim adjudicated by a judge
who is African American, than in like manner, this honorable Court must
not assign a judge to Claimant's claim who is a member of the Jewish
faith, as is legally consistent with the spirit of 28 USC 455 that requires the automatic
disqualification of a judge under certain circumstances; that while the
law refers to federal judges, the best interest of justice would hold
that "disqualification is required if an objective observer
would entertain reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a
judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude
that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be
disqualified" (Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147,
26) That Claimant relies on the verbiage of the U.S. Supreme
Court case Haines v.
Kerner, 404 U.S. 519 (1972); that while
this auspicious Court may not intimate any views whatsoever on the merits
of Plaintiff's allegations, that this Court justly concludes that the
Claimant is entitled to an opportunity to offer proof of her allegations.
27) This Claim is served and filed within 90 days of
reason of the foregoing, Claimant was damaged in the manner of Brown v.
State of New York, 89 N.Y.2d 172, 674 N.E.2d 1129, 652 N.Y.S.2d 223,
65 USLW 2355 (1996) and Bivens v.
Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971) such that Claimant's civil and
constitutional rights were violated in the amount of $10,000.000.00, and
for the intentional infliction of emotional/mental pain visited upon
Claimant by Defendant State of New York; that the Claimant demands
judgment against the Defendant for said amount.
VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK )
COUNTY OF KINGS )
I, Cheryl D. Uzamere, being
duly sworn, deposes and says that Deponent is the Claimant in the within
action; that deponent has read the foregoing Claim and knows the contents
thereof; that the same is true to Deponent's own knowledge, except as to
matters therein stated to be alleged upon information and belief, and
that as to those matters, Deponent believes it to be true.
Question to Gwendolyn Hatcher:
Does placing a fake date stamp on a
court document qualify
as an act of fraud upon the court?
Exhibit D (front)
Exhibit D (back)
Exhibit E (front)
Exhibit E (back)