A car parked in a parking lot

Description generated with high confidence

 

Home

 

Chapter 1: Forward: Babylonian Talmudic Hatred of Humans -- Are You a Victim of the Worship of Molech

 

 

Chapter 2: Come and Hear:  America’s New Government Church – Death for Christians

 

 

Chapter 3: Come and Hear: Sex with Children by Talmud Rules

 

 

Chapter 4: Come and Hear: Human Sacrifice, the Talmud, and the Moloch Problem

 

 

Chapter 5: United States v. Uzamere

 

Chapter 6: Uzamere v. Various Ashkenazi Leaders and Ashkenazi Judaism as a Hate Group

 

Chapter 7: Chapters of the Original Website

 

Chapter 8: Once Upon a Time

 

Chapter 9: Victim's Statement

 

Chapter 10: My Search for Justice

 

Chapter 11: Descent into Hell

 

Chapter 12: U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere

 

 

Chapter 13: Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere

 

 

Chapter 14: Ignored by Federal Agencies

 

Chapter 15: Ignored by Nigerian Authorities

 

Chapter 16: Victims' Loss of Child Support

 

Chapter 17: The Uzamere Family

 

Chapter 18: Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere

 

Chapter 19: John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community

 

Chapter 20: Hall of Shame

 

Chapter 21: 1st Judicial Blow by African-American Judge Thomas

 

Chapter 22: Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye

 

Chapter 23: Too Many Discrepancies...

 

Chapter 24: Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions

 

Chapter 25: Will Sampson Staff Refuse to Help Identity Fraud Victims?

 

Chapter 26:  Law Office of Gladstein and Messinger

 

Chapter 27: Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide

 

Chapter 28: Consulate General of Nigeria

 

Chapter 29: Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu

 

Chapter 30: Proof of Legal Marriage

 

Chapter 31: Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud

 

Chapter 32: Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail

 

Chapter 33: The Proof...

 

Chapter 34: Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!

 

Chapter 35: Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?

 

Chapter 36: Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere

 

Chapter 37: Judge Prus -- What Gives?

 

Chapter 38: Back on Track!

 

Chapter 39: Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law

 

Chapter 40: Petitioner's Verified Petition

 

Chapter 41: Supplemental Verified Petition

 

Chapter 42: Judge Prus Recuses Himself

 

Chapter 43: Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice

 

Chapter 44: Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar

 

Chapter 45: Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo

 

Chapter 46: My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin

 

Chapter 47: Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed

 

Chapter 48: Open Letters to the FBI

 

Chapter 49: Open Letter to All U.S. Judges

 

Chapter 50: Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene

 

Chapter 51: Tara's Affidavit

 

Chapter 52: $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries

 

Chapter 53: Will Fiduciaries Settle?

 

Chapter 54: New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze

 

Chapter 55: There Is No Cousin Godwin!

 

Chapter 56: Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State

 

Chapter 57: Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye

 

Chapter 58: Can International Agency Help?

 

Chapter 59: Chief Judge Wood's Court

 

Chapter 60: Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?

 

Chapter 61: Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis

 

Chapter 62: No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!

 

Chapter 63: Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?

 

Chapter 64: Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?

 

Chapter 65: Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!

 

Chapter 66: Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!

 

Chapter 67: Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses

 

Chapter 68: No Justice -- No Peace!

 

Chapter 69: Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel

 

Chapter 70: Are You a Victim of a Green Card Marriage Scam?

 

Chapter 71: End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship

 

Chapter 72: How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney

 

Chapter 73: Is the End Finally in Sight?

 

Chapter 74: Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?

 

Chapter 75: What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?

 

Chapter 76: How Will NYSDDC Respond?

 

Chapter 77: Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence

 

Chapter 78: Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise to The Challenge?

 

Chapter 79: Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits

 

Chapter 80: Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption

 

Chapter 81: Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored by Appellate Division's White Judiciary

 

Chapter 82: More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY

 

Chapter 83: Senator Uzamere...You Are the Husband!

 

Chapter 84: Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look on Idly?

 

Chapter 85: What will SCOTUS Do?

 

Chapter 86: Why did they disobey?

 

Chapter 87: Cabranes' Fraud Upon the Court

 

Chapter 88: Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?

 

Chapter 89: New York State Lawsuit for Fraud

 

Chapter 90: Judge Sunshine Is a Loser

 

Chapter 91: Judge Sunshine Out of Options

 

Chapter 92: Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing

 

Chapter 93: Petition for Rehearing

 

Chapter 94: Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah

 

Chapter 95: Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel

 

Chapter 96: Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid

 

Chapter 97: Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk

 

Chapter 98: Judge Scuccimarra Ruling

 

Chapter 99: Defendants Have Defaulted

 

Chapter 100: Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel

 

Chapter 101: New York Daily News and Anne B. Carroll

 

Chapter 102: Lawsuit Against President

 

Chapter 103: Will Obama Listen?

 

Chapter 104: Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra

 

Chapter 105: More Court Shenanigans

 

Chapter 106: Molech-Fomented Anti-Black Racism at Howard University

 

Chapter 107:  Into the fire...

 

Chapter 108: What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?

 

Chapter 109: Housing Court Corruption

 

Chapter 110: Mayor Bloomberg's Finest

 

Chapter 111: FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy

 

Chapter 112: FEGS Gave Victim No Choice

 

Chapter 113: What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?

 

Chapter 114: What Will Court of Claims Do?

 

Chapter 115: Molech-Worshipers’ Abuse of Religion Not New

 

Chapter 116: How Wicked Are They?

 

Chapter 117: What a Bunch of Lies

 

Chapter 118: Federal Lawsuit

 

Chapter 119: Disastrous Results to Appeal

 

Chapter 120: Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision

 

Chapter 121: Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans

 

Chapter 122: FOIA Hiding Evidence

 

Chapter 123: Congressional Testimony

 

Chapter 124: Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem

 

Chapter 125: Uzamere v. USA

 

Chapter 126: Judicial Whores Willy and Patty

 

Chapter 127: Find an Unbiased Court

 

Chapter 128: U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens

 

Chapter 129: Appellate Brief First Circuit

 

Chapter 130: U.S. Government Hides Prosecution

 

Chapter 131: A Molech-Fomented RICO

 

Chapter 132: Molech-Fomented Doctrine -- Law of the Moser

 

Chapter 133: Will African American Victim of Grand Larceny Receive Justice?

 

Chapter 134: Judicial Ethics Hypocrite

 

Chapter 135: Molech-Fomented Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge

 

 

Chapter 136: Please save my family!

 

Chapter 137: Psychopathic Defendants

 

Chapter 138: Molech-Fomented Paradigm Puts Molech Worshipers in Positions of Power

 

 

Chapter 139: Pretender Bharara

 

Chapter 140: International Lawsuit against Israel, the United States and Nigeria

 

 

Chapter 141: A Real Man

 

A close up of a mans face

Description generated with very high confidence

 

THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM

 

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)

 

Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors.

 

The individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

 

Diagnostic Features

 

The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.

 

. . .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).

 

"Recurrent" sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.

 

A picture containing indoor, wall

Description generated with high confidenceA picture containing clock, building

Description generated with very high confidenceA close up of a logo

Description generated with high confidence

 

 

What the Babylonian Talmud says about the worship of Molech: Mishnah. He who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does both.

 

Gemara. The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi) Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not idolatry.

 

Informing on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:

Mesira in Modern Times

(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah Zarah, Folio 26b)

 

Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*

The S. Daniel Abraham &

Ira L. Rennert Torah Ethics Project

The Orthodox Caucus

Toronto, Canada

Netivot HaTorah Day School

October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.

 

Even though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s) substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs on others as a pursuer (a rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing, even without a formal court ruling.

A person wearing glasses

Description generated with very high confidence

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976 audiobook murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear Youtube interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked about the Ashkenazi Jewish plan to take over the United States and the world.

Menachem Begin

Ovadia Yusef

Talmud -- Kill the best of the goyim

cid:image085.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

A group of people around each other

Description generated with high confidence

The Lost Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)

 

Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim: This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.

A person looking at the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html

 

cid:image010.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

 

Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.

 

cid:image015.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

 

Editor’s Note:  Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was tasked with silencing those involved.  He turned to the CIA.   The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy” operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington and New York primarily.

A picture containing clothing

Description generated with high confidence

A person lying on a bed

Description generated with very high confidence

cid:image021.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

cid:image023.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

cid:image029.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

cid:image033.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

A vintage photo of a group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

A group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a newspaper

Description generated with high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a sign

Description generated with high confidence

A person holding a sign

Description generated with high confidence

A picture containing cake, text, birthday, newspaper

Description generated with very high confidence

A picture containing grass, outdoor, animal, ground

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a newspaper

Description generated with very high confidence

A group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

http://come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html

A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

cid:image098.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

 

A close up of a person smiling for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

A group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

Click on the two photos above to see video.

israel-white-slaveryweb

cid:image100.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

White Gentiles Women

Beautiful White Ladies Who Are Victims of Rape in Israel

Angelique Sabag Gautiller -- Israel's first female pimp

White Slave Trade

Israel’s first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp and one of many whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to force beautiful, delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who have been tricked and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and then forced to part with their virginity and gang raped every night by sexually perverted Israeli and Arab men.

Sex bar in the old central bus station area, Tel Aviv
These streets are crowded with sex bars, sex shops and sex parlors.

The old central bus station area, Tel Aviv, on the street with the most sex parlors.
Sometimes it's surprising to see who the customers are.

The old central bus station area (also called Neveh Sha'anan) is the red light district of Tel Aviv. Over the years, it became mostly populated with foreign and illegal workers. Several suicide bombing attacks have been carried out here during the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian confrontation. In the present, it is the worst place in Tel Aviv, a world of prostitution and drugs, with a high crime rate.
Who can rent here a cheap appartment or open up a shop, is considered lucky, since so many people sleep on the streets or in deserted buildings. They have no other place to go to.

At

sleeping_beauties_29

Ira, 23 - Her mother left Russia after the divorce, together with her two daughters, hoping for a better life in Israel. Ira started to take drugs, her mother gave up on her and doesn't let her in the house anymore, scared that her other daughter will take Ira's example. She lives now on the street and works as a prostitute. After a two-day-storm and heavy rain when she slept on the streets, despite all the hot tea and blankets, she was shivering the whole day at the shelter for prostitutes.

sleeping_beauties_20

sleeping_beauties_27

Jasmin waiting for clients on a Friday night.

 

·         How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;

·         Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;

·         Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;

·         NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;

·         11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;

·         CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish ...;

·         New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza B'peh;

·         New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;

·         Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...

A picture containing indoor, person, baby

Description generated with very high confidence

A person standing in front of a crowd

Description generated with high confidence

A person holding a sign

Description generated with high confidence

A close up of a person

Description generated with high confidence

A picture containing person

Description generated with high confidence

A group of people looking at each other

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?

 

Talmudic Jews 'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to

Serve Us as Slaves'

cid:image086.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a beginning" but inadequate.

A person looking at the camera

Description generated with high confidence

Yair Netanyahu’s Night of Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell Recordings: Younger Netanyahu heard asking his friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for strippers, saying he owed him for $20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on photo to hear Yair audiotape)

 

A person looking at the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah Winfrey Show Discussing “Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her to Ashkenazi Jewish Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see Youtube video).

peckjewishslaves-tsr1_

cid:image113.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

The Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race, financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political, religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.

Jew whipping slave[6]

Ashkenazi sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being to death.

Jews controlled African slavery

A close up of a person

Description generated with high confidence

A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

https://youtu.be/Mg_13WJ4gDo;

https://youtu.be/MtKBjPxGmyc

Jewish control over American slavery #2

JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING

Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v. T.D. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.

 

Slave  Sale by Levin

The Ringworm Children- dealings between the US and Israeli_Nazi governments

The Ringworm Children

Tzila Levine and the Ashkenazi who took her

Yemeni child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman

Tziona Heiman and her biological Yemeni mother

Adult child with biological mother

Israel's Yemeni Baby Scandal

The Lavon Affair

Lavon Affair # 4

Deaths at U.S.S. Liberty

 

Injuries at U.S.S. Liberty

liberty_Main_Blast_Area

U.S.S. Liberty Attacks America

U.S.S. Liberty Gravesites

USS Liberty Crew

A picture containing text, newspaper

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a social media post

Description generated with very high confidence

A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a person

Description generated with high confidence

Israel Abuses Thai Workers

Thai workers in Israel

Israeli False Flag on France #2

Israeli False Flag on France #3

Israeli False Flag on France #4

MH17 -- Israel False Flag

Israel Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)

 

A group of people on a sidewalk

Description generated with high confidence

Israeli schoolchildren dressed up as the burning

Twin Towers. Costume won best prize.

 

Countries that lost citizens on 9/11:

http://brilliantmaps.com/9-11-victims;

 

Israel Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo

to see Youtube video)

 

A person sitting in front of a television screen

Description generated with very high confidence

 

9/11 Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on

photo to see Youtube video)

 

WTC Destruction of Building

WTC Falling Death4

WTC Falling Death2[3]

WTC Falling Death6

WTC Falling Death

WTC dead hand

Palestinians Killed and Scorned by Jews

Dead Palestinian Children

Palestinian Girl's Brains Blown Out

Palestinian child with guts blown out

Palestinian Princess 3

Palestinian Victime of Jew Kidney Grubbing

Israelis using pepper spray against Palestinians

Ethiopian Women and Depo Provera

Haaretz Story of Ethiopian Women Given Depo Provera

Mike Peled

Rosenbaum-organ-trafficking

Israel-Islamic State Trafficking in Body Parts

From Israel with Kidney

Israeli Kidney Network Busted in Ukraine

Israel Kidney Scandal in UkraineScreen-shot-2012-03-18-at-12.56.25-PM

Israel Steals Kidneys from HaitiEthiopians Go Back to Africa
Baltimore Is Here
Israelizing the Police


cid:247A1ABBA41049E8B4F3AD2FA8DCBACA@CherylHomeOfficeComputer
Amadou Diallo -- 41 Shots

Freddie Gray

Freddie Gray dragged (2)

Freddie Gray in Hospital

funeral-freddie-gray

Sean Bell 50 Shots

Sean Bell Funeral

Rodney King and Police Assault

Eric Garner Alive with Daughter

Eric Garner Chokehold

Eric Garner Dead

Eric Garner Funeral

NYC Settles Garner Death for 5.9 Million

State Trooper who saw Tawana

Nurse who interviewed Tawana

Tawana Brawley in Hospital

Tawana Crying

C._Vernon_Mason (2)

cid:image128.jpg@01D33D6E.244AB8D0

The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere

A picture containing wall, indoor, person, light

Description generated with very high confidence

“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah.”

שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד

 

            “Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.

Talmud -- Kill the best of the goyimJew whipping slave[6]cid:image113.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0cid:image023.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0A person lying on a bed

Description generated with very high confidenceA picture containing cake, text, birthday, newspaper

Description generated with very high confidenceA group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

cid:image100.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidenceA person looking at the camera

Description generated with very high confidenceA group of people on a sidewalk

Description generated with high confidenceA picture containing indoor, person, baby

Description generated with very high confidenceA close up of a person

Description generated with high confidenceA group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

 

 

 

 

 

Chapter 85:

 

What Will the U.S. Supreme Court Do?

scotusjustices2.jpg

Did America's Premier Law Enforcement Agency

Enforce the Following Laws:

Federal Statutes violated

Committed by whom? 

Violation addressed?

·         8 USC 1325(a)(3), False representations;

·         8 USC 1325(c), Marriage fraud;

·         8 USC 1325(d), Entrepreneurship fraud;

·         18 USC 4, Misprision of felony;

·         18 USC 3290, fugitive of justice;

·         18 USC 1001(a)(1)(2)(3), False statements

Uzamere, Kaye, Shapiro

Uzamere, Kaye, Shapiro

Kaye, Shapiro

All defendants

Uzamere, Kaye, Shapiro

Uzamere, Kaye, Shapiro

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

__No

__No

__No

__No

__No

Federal Case Law violated

Committed by whom?

Violation addressed?

·         Bulloch v. United States, Fraud upon the court;

 

·         Liteky v. U.S., Disqualification judges;

all judges in all cases

 

 

all judges in all cases

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

__No

__No

__No

__No

__No

 

New York State Law Violated

 

Committed by whom?

 

Violation addressed? 

·         PEN 260, Non-support of a child, 2nd degree

 

·         PEN 255.15, Bigamy

 

·         PEN 175.35, Offering a false statement

Uzamere

 

 

Uzamere

 

Uzamere, Kaye, Shapiro

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

__Yes

ü

ü

ü

ü

ü

__No

__No

__No

__No

__No

As of now, the U.S. Department of Justice, the New York State Attorney General's Office, the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, the New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division, 2nd Judicial Department have all suspended their continued acts of lawlessness until the Supreme Court of the United States makes a decision on my case.  If it decides against me, it will be criminal business as usual with the State of New York.

***What will SCOTUS do?

***

I invite the public to keep abreast of the developments that take place in my case.

The world should know if justice really exist for helpless schvartzes in America.

***

***

questionmark.jpg

scotoswritletter.jpg

ussolicitorgeneralwaiverltr.jpg

nysagltrsuter.jpg

nyccorpcounselwaiverltr.jpg

-

Minus Sign 24 Minus Sign 24 Minus Sign 24

Minus Sign 13 Minus Sign 13 Minus Sign 13

*

Docket No. 09-5816 

In The

 Supreme Court of the United States

______________

Cheryl D. Uzamere

Petitioner,

- vs. -

Allen E. Kaye, P.C.; Uzamere and Associates, PLLC; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP; Allen E. Kaye Esq.; Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq.; Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; Jack Gladstein, Esq.; Eugenia Cowles, Esq.; Rachel McCarthy, Esq.; Andrew Cuomo, Esq.; Honorable Michael Bloomberg; Honorable A. Gail Prudenti, Judge of the Appellate Court 2nd Judicial Department; Honorable Abraham Gerges, Judge of the Supreme Court, Kings County; Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine, Judge of Supreme Court Kings County; James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of Appellate Court 2nd Judicial Department; Joseph Visceglia, Municipal Clerk; Bernard J. Rostansky, Notary Public; State of New York; City of New York and New York City Clerk's Office

Respondents,

______________

*

Petition for a Writ of Certiorari to

the United States Court of Appeal

for the Second Circuit

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

______________

*

Cheryl D. Uzamere

Appearing Pro Se

1209 Loring Avenue, Apt. 6B

Brooklyn, NY 11208

Opposing Counsel on Inside Cover

-

Minus Sign 13 Minus Sign 13 Minus Sign 13

Minus Sign 24 Minus Sign 24 Minus Sign 24

 

Office of the Solicitor General

U.S. Department of Justice

950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW

Washington, DC 20530-0001

Counsel for Federal Defendants

Jack Gladstein, Esq

Gladstein & Messinger

118-21 Queens Boulevard

Forest Hills, NY 11375

NYS Office of the

Attorney General

120 Broadway

New York, NY 10278

Counsel for NYS Defendants

Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq.

Uzamere and Associates

1851 Watson Avenue

Bronx, NY 10472

 

New York City Law Dept.

100 Church Street

New York, NY 10007-2601

Counsel for NYC Defendants

Allen E. Kaye, P.C.

111 Broadway

13th Floor

New York, NY 10006

Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver

& Jacobsen, LLP

One New York Plaza

New York, NY

Counsel for Allen Kaye and

Robert Juceam

Bernard J. Rostanski, Esq.

Traffic Violations Bureau

625 Atlantic Avenue

Brooklyn, NY 11217

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

1)     Whether adherent-respondents of the religion that promulgates the Abodah Zarah's Law of the Moser violated petitioner's due process and equal protection rights by failing to disqualify themselves;

 

2)     Whether petitioner's due process and equal protection rights were violated pursuant to Bivens.

 

- i -

PARTIES TO THE PROCEEDING

 

Pursuant to Rule 14.1(b), the following list identifies all of the parties appearing here and before the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The petitioner and appellant is Cheryl D. Uzamere.

The appellees and respondents below are Allen E. Kaye, P.C.; Uzamere and Associates, PLLC; Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson, LLP; Allen E. Kaye Esq.; Eugene O. Uzamere, Esq.; Robert E. Juceam, Esq.; Jack Gladstein, Esq.; Eugenia Cowles, Esq.; Rachel McCarthy, Esq.; Andrew Cuomo, Esq.; Honorable Michael Bloomberg; Honorable A. Gail Prudenti, Judge of the Appellate Court 2nd Judicial Department; Honorable Abraham Gerges, Judge of the Supreme Court, Kings County; Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine, Judge of Supreme Court Kings County; James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of Appellate Court 2nd Judicial Department; Joseph Visceglia, Municipal Clerk; Bernard J. Rostansky, Notary Public; State of New York; City of New York and New York City Clerk's Office.

 

- ii -

OPINIONS BELOW

        The opinion of the Court of Appeals is reported at Appendix A to the Petition (Pet. App. A) and is unpublished. The opinion of the Court of Appeals' regarding petitioner's motion for reconsideration for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is reported at Pet. App. B and is unpublished.  The opinion of the Court of Appeals regarding petitioner's motion for preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order is reported at Pet. App. C and is unpublished.  The District Court's opinion is reported at Pet. App. D and is unpublished.

JURISDICTION

        The date on which the United States Court of Appeals decided petitioner's case was June 22, 2009.

        No petition for rehearing was filed in petitioner's case.

        The jurisdiction of this Court is invoked under 28 U.S.C. 1254(1).

CONSTITUTIONAL, STATUTORY AND CASE LAW PROVISIONS INVOLVED

        The constitutional provisions upon which this Petition are as follows: Fifth Amendment and Fourteenth Amendment.

        The statutory provision upon which this Petition is based is as follows: 18 U.S.C. 4 and 28 U.S.C. 455.

        The case law provisions on which this Petition is based are as follows: Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, Liljeberg  v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988), United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985), Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989),  Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972),   Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954), United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) and Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents, 403 US 388.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

        A.  Factual Background

         This petition has its basis in several acts of judicial corruption petitioner alleges are still aimed to prevent petitioner from reporting respondent Allen E. Kaye's, Harvey Shapiro's and respondent Bernard J. Rostanski's falsification of an I-130 immediate relative sponsorship form, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 4.

        On November 20, 1979, New York City marriage license clerk respondent Joseph Visceglia fraudulently signed his name on petitioner's marriage affidavit, while allowing Allen Kaye's client Ehigie Edobor Uzamere to place the fictitious name Godwin Uzamere on the marriage affidavit without requiring him to verify his identity and date of birth.  The marriage affidavit is reported at Pet. App. E.

        On November 21, 1979, believing that the name Godwin E. Uzamere and birthday June 1, 1955 were true and correct, petitioner unwittingly contracted a marriage with Allen Kaye's client, whose real name is Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, and whose real birthday is December 31, 1960.

        On or around November 30, 1979, petitioner accompanied Allen Kaye's client to the aforesaid attorney's law office to sign the 1-130 immediate relative sponsorship form, after which Allen Kaye's client abandoned petitioner while petitioner was pregnant with their daughter Tara.  Fraudulent I-130 immediate relative sponsorship form is reported at Pet. App. F.

        During ensuing years, the petitioner filed complaints against Allen Kaye's client and against Allen Kaye with the former U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service and other federal, state and municipal agencies.

        No governmental agency has ever prosecuted Allen Kaye's client Ehigie Edobor Uzamere or Allen Kaye as a result of petitioner's complaints.

         Petitioner filed her divorce action on or around July 13, 2007.

        On page 5, paragraph 2 of petitioner's Verified Complaint, petitioner stated that Allen Kaye, Mr. Shapiro or someone in the law firms employ presented the marriage license, in its entirety, to the United States Immigration and Naturalization   Service   as   true   and correct for the purpose of the Defendant obtaining permanent residence through sponsorship by the Plaintiff.  Page 5 of petitioner's Verified Complaint is reported at Pet. App. G.

        That by November 11, 2007, Allen Kaye's client Ehigie Edobor Uzamere did not interpose an answer and has defaulted, pursuant to New York State Civil Practice Law and Rules 3215 and New York Codes, Rules and Regulations 202.27.

         Petitioner first appeared before the Honorable Eric I. Prus on December 5, 2007.

        Justice Prus is an adherent of the religion that promulgates the Abodah Zarah's Law of the Moser, the Talmudic doctrine that prohibits its adherents from reporting the crimes of fellow adherents to secular authorities. Rabbi Michael J. Broyde's Informing on Jews Who Commit Crimes is reported at Pet. App. H.

         From December 5, 2007, the date of Judge Prus' first scheduled preliminary conference until September 2, 2008, the date of Judge Prus' second preliminary conference, Judge Prus adjourned petitioner's divorce action eight (8) times, and Allen Kaye's client Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere failed to appear for all of them.  New York State Unified Court System's appearance schedule is reported at Pet. App. I.

         That on September 2, 2008, the eighth time petitioner's divorce action was adjourned, respondent Eugene O. Uzamere, claiming to be Allen Kaye's client's attorney, signed the preliminary conference stipulation in place of Allen Kaye's client. Page 2 of preliminary conference stipulation is reported at Pet. App. J.

         That pursuant to New York Codes, Rules and Regulations 202.16(f)(vi), all parties must personally be present at the time of the conference.

          That on September 2, 2008, Allen Kaye's client failed to appear.

         That Judge Prus recused himself after petitioner filed appellate division petition Uzamere vs. Prus. New York State Appellate Division's decision is reported at Pet. App. K.

          That respondent the Honorable Jeffrey S. Sunshine was the next justice to be assigned to preside over petitioner's divorce action.

         That Justice Sunshine is an adherent of the religion that promulgates the Abodah Zarah's Law of the Moser, the Talmudic doctrine that prohibits its adherents from reporting the crimes of fellow adherents to secular authorities.

         That on October 7, 2008, the ninth time petitioner's divorce action was adjourned, the respondent Eugene O. Uzamere appeared before respondent Justice Sunshine to move the court to dismiss petitioner's divorce action against respondent Allen E.  Kaye's  former client Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, based on Mr. Uzamere's submission of a fraudulent counter-affidavit emanating from Nigeria  that  was  not  authenticated by the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria; said counter-affidavit alleging that petitioner is married, not to Allen Kaye's client, but to Allen Kaye's client's cousin; and that Allen Kaye's client and the alleged cousin bear the same name.  Respondent Eugene O. Uzamere's Affirmation and counter-affidavit are reported at Pet. App. L.

         On or November 13, 2008, the eleventh time that petitioner appeared before Respondent Justice to determine the status of her motion, respondent Allen E. Kaye's client Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere failed to appear.

        That on November 17, 2008, four (4) days after petitioner's divorce action was adjourned for the eleventh time without an appearance from Allen Kaye's client, petitioner filed a Bivens action based on, inter alia, violation of petitioner's constitutional rights.

        On January 13, 2009, the twelfth time that petitioner appeared before respondent Justice Sunshine, respondent Allen E. Kaye's client Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere did not appear.

        On the aforesaid date, respondent Justice Sunshine adjourned petitioner's divorce action pursuant to his Decision and Order dated January 12, 2009, that states,  inter alia  that  ...although  defendant  has failed to interpose an answer, he has submitted opposition to plaintiff's motion for spousal and child support, has filed  his  own  motion  to  dismiss, and has participated (through his attorney) in  a preliminary conference.  As noted above, such actions weigh against a finding of default in matrimonial actions.  Moreover, the opposition submitted by defendant raises a genuine issue as to whether or not plaintiff and defendant were married in the  first  instance...those  branches  of  plaintiff's  motion  which  seek  retroactive, present, and future spousal support, injunctive relief, and discovery materials, as well as defendant's motion to dismiss plaintiff's action are hereby held in abeyance pending an evidentiary hearing on the threshold issue of whether plaintiff and defendant were in fact married...Any requested trial subpoenas shall be submitted no later than January 20, 2009.  Pages 9 and 12 of respondent Justice Sunshine's Decision and Order dated January 12, 2009 are reported at Pet. App. M1 and M2.

        On January 22, 2009 respondent Justice Sunshine signed subpoenas for, among other individuals, respondent Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro.  Subpoenas for Allen E. Kaye and Harvey Shapiro are report at Pet. App. N1 and N2.

        On February 17, 2009, petitioner filed an order to show cause to appeal respondent Justice Sunshine's Decision and Order dated January 12, 2009.  New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division 2nd Judicial Department's Order to Show Cause is reported at Pet. App. O1 and O2.

        That respondent Allen Kaye's client did not respond.  Appellate Division's decision dated April 6, 2009 is reported at Pet. App. P.

        That in the affidavit accompanying petitioner's Order to Show Cause, petitioner submitted the following documents as evidence of Allen Kaye's client's identity:

        (a)     Defendant-Appellee Allen E. Kaye's letter in which he refers to petitioner's husband as Ehigie E. Uzamere and her husband.  Allen Kaye's letter is reported at Pet. App. Q;

        (b)     I-130 immigration form that was falsified by and bears the falsified name of petitioner's husband and the names of Allen E. Kaye, Esq., Harvey Shapiro, Esq. and Bernard J. Rostanski (Pet. App. F);

        (c)     Report by Rachel McCarthy, Bar Counsel, USCIS regarding Defendant/husband's two identities.  USCIS' report is report at Pet. App. R;

        (d)    Rachel McCarthy's letter dated January 6, 2009 in which she states that The acts that you allege...occurred in the course of representation by an attorney associated with Mr. Kaye in connection with a petition for an immediate relative filed by you with the Immigration and Naturalization Service  Letter from Rachel McCarthy is reported at Pet. App. S.

        On or around March 24, 2009 petitioner received correspondence from respondent Allen E. Kaye that was addressed to respondent Judge Sunshine in which Mr. Kaye stated his refusal to appear in court.  Allen Kaye's refusal letter is reported at Pet. App. T.

        On March 26, 2009, the thirteenth time the petitioner appeared before respondent Judge Sunshine, respondent Eugene O. Uzamere moved the court to be relieved as counsel for Allen Kaye's client's Senator Uzamere.  Eugene Uzamere's motion is reported at Pet. App. U.

        On April 7, Federal District Judge Leonard B Sand dismissed petitioner's complaint.

        On April 8, 2009, petitioner served Allen Kaye's client with petitioner's appellant brief in opposition to Judge Sunshine's order dated January 12, 2009.

        On May 12, 2009, the fifteenth time that petitioner appeared before respondent Justice Sunshine, 19 days after the date of respondent Allen Kaye's refusal letter, respondent Justice Sunshine adjudged that Allen Kaye's client, Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere is petitioner's husband.  Judge Sunshine's Decision and Order dated May 12, 2009 attached as Pet. App. V).

        As of May 13, 2009, Allen Kaye's client, Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere failed to interpose a reply in rebuttal to petitioner's brief.

        Respondent Justice Sunshine scheduled an adjournment for the sixteenth time to hold a trial to dispose of all issues; and that petitioner appealed the aforesaid issues to New York State Supreme Court's Appellate Division, Second Department.

        An oral argument with regard to the appeal in which respondent A. Gail Prudenti is the presiding justice has not been scheduled.

        B.     Proceedings in Court of Appeals

        On May 26, 2009, petitioner filed an order to show cause for a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to requirement the disqualification of respondent Justice Sunshine.

        On May 29, 2009 petitioner's motion was dismissed without comment and was not published (see Pet. App. C).

        On June 8 and 9, 2009, petitioner filed an order to show cause and supporting papers for a reconsideration of her preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order.

        On June 22, 2009, petitioner's motion was dismissed without comment and was not published (see Pet. App. B).

REASONS FOR GRANTING WRIT

        I. Court of Appeals Erred in Dismissing Petitioner's Appeal Pursuant to District Court's Violation of 28 U.S.C. 455

        Disqualification is Mandatory

        The Honorable Leonard B. Sand is listed with the Virtual Jewish Library; and that based on the aforesaid information, the District Court's judge appears to have a bias as he is an adherent of the religion that promulgates the Talmudic prohibition preventing its adherents from reporting the crimes of fellow adherents to secular authorities.  The Honorable Judge Sand's biography is reported at Pet. App. W.

        Attorney Bob Ballew, author of What Causes the Disqualification of Judges, says the following:  In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge's impartiality. If a judge's attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified." Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994) ... Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality.  Liljeberg  v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) "is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.") ("Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. 455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.").

        That Court also stated that Section 455(a) "requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that "It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice."

        The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that "justice must satisfy the appearance of justice", Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954).

        Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances." Taylor v. O'Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).

        Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his "appearance of partiality" which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an "appearance of partiality" and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law and are of no legal force or effect. 

       Refusal to Recuse Violates Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution

        Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) ("The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.").

        II.     Court of Appeals Erred in Dismissing Petitioner's Appeal Pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Fed. Narcotics Agents

        The Court of Appeals erred in not questioning the decision of the District Court, in which it failed to recognize petitioner's lawsuit as a Bivens action.

        According to Wikipedia.org, Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), was a case in which the United States Supreme Court  ruled that an implied cause of action existed for an individual whose Fourth Amendment freedom   from  unreasonable  search  and  seizures  had  been  violated  by  federal agents. The victim of such a deprivation could sue for the violation of the Amendment itself, despite the lack of any federal statute authorizing such a suit. The existence of a remedy for the violation was implied from the importance of the right violated.  The Court, in an opinion by Justice Brennan, stated that "For the reasons set forth below, I am of the opinion that federal courts do have the power to award damages for violation of "constitutionally protected interests" and I agree with the Court that a traditional judicial remedy such as damages is appropriate to the vindication of the personal interests protected by the Fourth Amendment.

        By that decision, the Court laid down the rule that it will imply a private right of action for monetary damages where no other federal remedy is provided for the vindication of a Constitutional right, based on the principle that for every wrong, there is a remedy. The Court reasoned based upon a presumption that where there is a violation of a right, the plaintiff can recover whatever he could recover under any civil action, unless Congress has expressly curtailed that right of recovery, or there exist some "special factor counseling hesitation."

CONCLUSION

        For the reasons stated above, petitioner respectfully prays that this Court remands this action to the District Court.


PLEASE HELP ME HELP MY FAMILY

uzamerewalkerfamily.jpg

CherylsFamily.jpg