A car parked in a parking lot

Description generated with high confidence

 

Home

 

Chapter 1: Forward: Babylonian Talmudic Hatred of Humans -- Are You a Victim of the Worship of Molech

 

 

Chapter 2: Come and Hear:  America’s New Government Church – Death for Christians

 

 

Chapter 3: Come and Hear: Sex with Children by Talmud Rules

 

 

Chapter 4: Come and Hear: Human Sacrifice, the Talmud, and the Moloch Problem

 

 

Chapter 5: United States v. Uzamere

 

Chapter 6: Uzamere v. Various Ashkenazi Leaders and Ashkenazi Judaism as a Hate Group

 

Chapter 7: Chapters of the Original Website

 

Chapter 8: Once Upon a Time

 

Chapter 9: Victim's Statement

 

Chapter 10: My Search for Justice

 

Chapter 11: Descent into Hell

 

Chapter 12: U.S. Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere

 

 

Chapter 13: Nigerian Laws Violated by Senator Uzamere

 

 

Chapter 14: Ignored by Federal Agencies

 

Chapter 15: Ignored by Nigerian Authorities

 

Chapter 16: Victims' Loss of Child Support

 

Chapter 17: The Uzamere Family

 

Chapter 18: Municipal Employees Who Helped Senator Uzamere

 

Chapter 19: John Gray and Non-Profit Legal Community

 

Chapter 20: Hall of Shame

 

Chapter 21: 1st Judicial Blow by African-American Judge Thomas

 

Chapter 22: Law Firm of Allen E. Kaye

 

Chapter 23: Too Many Discrepancies...

 

Chapter 24: Allen E. Kaye And His Diabolical Talmud-Following Minions

 

Chapter 25: Will Sampson Staff Refuse to Help Identity Fraud Victims?

 

Chapter 26:  Law Office of Gladstein and Messinger

 

Chapter 27: Patrick Synmoie's Attempts to Hide

 

Chapter 28: Consulate General of Nigeria

 

Chapter 29: Strange Chat with Senator Ekweremadu

 

Chapter 30: Proof of Legal Marriage

 

Chapter 31: Proof of Illegal Marriage/Identity Fraud

 

Chapter 32: Senator Uzamere's Attempts to Hide Crimes Will Fail

 

Chapter 33: The Proof...

 

Chapter 34: Success -- The Proof Is Finally Here!

 

Chapter 35: Will Senator Uzamere Evade Child Support Again?

 

Chapter 36: Nigeria's New Commitment to Protect Child Abandoned by Sen. Uzamere

 

Chapter 37: Judge Prus -- What Gives?

 

Chapter 38: Back on Track!

 

Chapter 39: Eugene Uzamere -- Third Attorney to Break the Law

 

Chapter 40: Petitioner's Verified Petition

 

Chapter 41: Supplemental Verified Petition

 

Chapter 42: Judge Prus Recuses Himself

 

Chapter 43: Eugene's Failed Attempt to Thwart Justice

 

Chapter 44: Kate Ezomo -- Diabolical Liar

 

Chapter 45: Letters of Complaint Against Kate Ezomo

 

Chapter 46: My Factual Response to Imaginary Cousin Godwin

 

Chapter 47: Federal Action Against Defendant Dismissed

 

Chapter 48: Open Letters to the FBI

 

Chapter 49: Open Letter to All U.S. Judges

 

Chapter 50: Open Letter to Ehigie and Eugene

 

Chapter 51: Tara's Affidavit

 

Chapter 52: $100,000,000.00 Lawsuit Against Corrupt Fiduciaries

 

Chapter 53: Will Fiduciaries Settle?

 

Chapter 54: New York City Defrauds Disabled Schvartze

 

Chapter 55: There Is No Cousin Godwin!

 

Chapter 56: Warning Letter to Governor and Chief Justice of New York State

 

Chapter 57: Deprived of Child Support by Allen Kaye

 

Chapter 58: Can International Agency Help?

 

Chapter 59: Chief Judge Wood's Court

 

Chapter 60: Will NYS' Dept. Disc. Committee and Commission on Judicial Conduct Be Corrupted?

 

Chapter 61: Subpoena Planned for Judge Garaufis

 

Chapter 62: No Negotiations for Justice...Justice is Owed!

 

Chapter 63: Will Attorneys Sign Affirmation?

 

Chapter 64: Am I Finally Being Taken Seriously?

 

Chapter 65: Evidentiary Hearing is Scheduled!

 

Chapter 66: Amy Feinstein Refuses to Prosecute!

 

Chapter 67: Robert Juceam's Useless Excuses

 

Chapter 68: No Justice -- No Peace!

 

Chapter 69: Happy Birthday My Beautiful Angel

 

Chapter 70: Are You a Victim of a Green Card Marriage Scam?

 

Chapter 71: End Green Card Marriage Sponsorship

 

Chapter 72: How to Report an Immigration Scammer and the Attorney

 

Chapter 73: Is the End Finally in Sight?

 

Chapter 74: Will Appellate Division Justices Decide Fairly?

 

Chapter 75: What Will NYSCJC's Response Be?

 

Chapter 76: How Will NYSDDC Respond?

 

Chapter 77: Will Obama's Administration Coerce Helpless Schvartze's Silence

 

Chapter 78: Will U.S. Department of State's Secretary Rise to The Challenge?

 

Chapter 79: Eugene Uzamere Calls It Quits

 

Chapter 80: Bigot Judge Sunshine Continues Courtroom Corruption

 

Chapter 81: Schvartze's Complaints Still Ignored by Appellate Division's White Judiciary

 

Chapter 82: More Talmudic Bias and Anti-Schvartze Racism At SDNY

 

Chapter 83: Senator Uzamere...You Are the Husband!

 

Chapter 84: Will U.S. Solicitor General Office Look on Idly?

 

Chapter 85: What will SCOTUS Do?

 

Chapter 86: Why did they disobey?

 

Chapter 87: Cabranes' Fraud Upon the Court

 

Chapter 88: Is Hinds-Radix Their 'Secret' Weapon?

 

Chapter 89: New York State Lawsuit for Fraud

 

Chapter 90: Judge Sunshine Is a Loser

 

Chapter 91: Judge Sunshine Out of Options

 

Chapter 92: Petitioner Prepares Request for Rehearing

 

Chapter 93: Petition for Rehearing

 

Chapter 94: Loser Sunshine's Last Hurrah

 

Chapter 95: Lawsuit Against Daily News and Scott Shifrel

 

Chapter 96: Mort Zuckerman's Bigoted Tabloid

 

Chapter 97: Corruption at Nassau County Supreme Court and Nassau County Clerk

 

Chapter 98: Judge Scuccimarra Ruling

 

Chapter 99: Defendants Have Defaulted

 

Chapter 100: Judge Parga Accepts Anne Carroll's Drivel

 

Chapter 101: New York Daily News and Anne B. Carroll

 

Chapter 102: Lawsuit Against President

 

Chapter 103: Will Obama Listen?

 

Chapter 104: Open Letter to Al Jazeera, President Obama and Judge Allegra

 

Chapter 105: More Court Shenanigans

 

Chapter 106: Molech-Fomented Anti-Black Racism at Howard University

 

Chapter 107:  Into the fire...

 

Chapter 108: What Will The New York State Division of Human Rights Do?

 

Chapter 109: Housing Court Corruption

 

Chapter 110: Mayor Bloomberg's Finest

 

Chapter 111: FEGS in Criminal Conspiracy

 

Chapter 112: FEGS Gave Victim No Choice

 

Chapter 113: What Will The New York State Supreme Court Do?

 

Chapter 114: What Will Court of Claims Do?

 

Chapter 115: Molech-Worshipers’ Abuse of Religion Not New

 

Chapter 116: How Wicked Are They?

 

Chapter 117: What a Bunch of Lies

 

Chapter 118: Federal Lawsuit

 

Chapter 119: Disastrous Results to Appeal

 

Chapter 120: Judge Garaufis' Discriminatory Decision

 

Chapter 121: Garaufis' Talmudic Shenanigans

 

Chapter 122: FOIA Hiding Evidence

 

Chapter 123: Congressional Testimony

 

Chapter 124: Unintelligible Complaint of Rachel G. Yohalem

 

Chapter 125: Uzamere v. USA

 

Chapter 126: Judicial Whores Willy and Patty

 

Chapter 127: Find an Unbiased Court

 

Chapter 128: U.S. Government Blacklists Own Citizens

 

Chapter 129: Appellate Brief First Circuit

 

Chapter 130: U.S. Government Hides Prosecution

 

Chapter 131: A Molech-Fomented RICO

 

Chapter 132: Molech-Fomented Doctrine -- Law of the Moser

 

Chapter 133: Will African American Victim of Grand Larceny Receive Justice?

 

Chapter 134: Judicial Ethics Hypocrite

 

Chapter 135: Molech-Fomented Shenanigans Involved in Random Selection of Morally Compromised Judge

 

 

Chapter 136: Please save my family!

 

Chapter 137: Psychopathic Defendants

 

Chapter 138: Molech-Fomented Paradigm Puts Molech Worshipers in Positions of Power

 

 

Chapter 139: Pretender Bharara

 

Chapter 140: International Lawsuit against Israel, the United States and Nigeria

 

 

Chapter 141: A Real Man

 

A close up of a mans face

Description generated with very high confidence

 

Both of My Children Were Molested in Foster Care. Member of the Democratic Party Have Ganged up on My Family to Stop Us from Telling Our Story.

A person smiling for the camera

Description generated with high confidenceA person smiling for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

Proof that Ehigie Edobor Uzamere Was Still Married to Me at the Time that He Celebrated his 25th Wedding Anniversary with 2nd Wife Iriagbonse Irowa.

Federal Law Enforcement Visits My Apartment Without Warrants to Kill Me and Take My Computer Under the Guise of “Counterterrorism.”

Telephone Call with Verizon Employees Who Confirm that Verizon Violated NACHA and EFTA Rules by Taking Money from My Paid Telephone Bill and Sending it to Metavante Corporation 18 Days after I Paid the Bill

Proof that Verizon’s Telephone Service Was Off by February 3, 2018

Problems with Social Security Administration: Proof that the Social Security Administration Sent Two Test Checks to Confirm the Existence of my Paypal Prepaid Account

Problems with the Social Security Administration: Proof that the Social Security Administration Illegally Held my SSDI Check

·         Bridgette Davis’ False Allegation that I Threatened Federal Employees

·         Conversation with CMS that Proves that I Did Not Threaten Anyone

·         FBI’s Implied Threat to Put Me in a Mental Institution

 

THE SIMILARITIES BETWEEN THE WORSHIP OF MOLECH AND DSM V’s DIAGNOSIS OF SEXUAL SADISM

 

Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Illnesses; Sexual Sadism Disorder Diagnostic Criteria 302.84 (F65.52)

 

Over a period of at least 6 months, recurrent and intense sexual arousal from the physical or psychological suffering of another person, as manifested by fantasies, urges, or behaviors.

 

The individual has acted on these sexual urges with a nonconsenting person, or the sexual urges or fantasies cause clinically significant distress or impairment in social, occupational, or other important areas of functioning.

 

Diagnostic Features

 

The diagnostic criteria for sexual sadism disorder are intended to apply both to individuals who freely admit to having such paraphilic interests and to those who deny any sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary.

 

. . .Examples of individuals who deny any interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual include individuals known to have inflicted pain or suffering on multiple victims on separate occasions but who deny any urges or fantasies about such sexual behavior and who may further claim that known episodes of sexual assault were either unintentional or nonsexual. Others may admit past episodes of sexual behavior involving the infliction of pain or suffering on a nonconsenting individual but do not report any significant or sustained sexual interest in the physical or psychological suffering of another individual. Since these individuals deny having urges or fantasies involving sexual arousal to pain and suffering, it follows that they would also deny feeling subjectively distressed or socially impaired by such impulses. Such individuals may be diagnosed with sexual sadism disorder despite their negative self-report. Their recurrent behavior constitutes clinical support for the presence of the paraphilia of sexual sadism (by satisfying Criterion A) and simultaneously demonstrates that their paraphilically motivated behavior is causing clinically significant distress, harm, or risk of harm to others (satisfying Criterion B).

 

"Recurrent" sexual sadism involving nonconsenting others (i.e., multiple victims, each on a separate occasion) may, as general rule, be interpreted as three or more victims on separate occasions. Fewer victims can be interpreted as satisfying this criterion, if there are multiple instances of infliction of pain and suffering to the same victim, or if there is corroborating evidence of a strong or preferential interest in pain and suffering involving multiple victims. Note that multiple victims, as suggested earlier, are a sufficient but not a necessary condition for diagnosis, as the criteria may be met if the individual acknowledges intense sadistic sexual interest.

 

A picture containing indoor, wall

Description generated with high confidenceA picture containing clock, building

Description generated with very high confidenceA close up of a logo

Description generated with high confidence

What the Babylonian Talmud says about the worship of Molech: Mishnah. He who gives of his seed to Molech incurs no punishment unless he delivers it to Molech and causes it to pass through the fire. If he gave it to Molech but did not cause it to pass through the fire, or the reverse, he incurs no penalty, unless he does both.

 

Gemara. The Mishnah teaches idolatry and giving to Molech. R(abbi) Abin said: Our Mishnah is in accordance with the view that Molech worship is not idolatry.

 

Informing on Fellow Jews who Commit Crimes:

Mesira in Modern Times

(Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Abodah Zarah, Folio 26b)

 

Rabbi Michael J. Broyde*

The S. Daniel Abraham &

Ira L. Rennert Torah Ethics Project

The Orthodox Caucus

Toronto, Canada

Netivot HaTorah Day School

October 19, 2001, at 8:00 p.m.

 

Even though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law...Even is secular government...incorporate(s) substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs on others as a pursuer (a rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing, even without a formal court ruling.

A person wearing glasses

Description generated with very high confidence

The Harold Wallace Rosenthal Interview 1976 audiobook murdered 30 days after this interview (click on video to hear Youtube interview). In this video, Mr. Rosenthal talked about the Ashkenazi Jewish plan to take over the United States and the world.

Menachem Begin

Ovadia Yusef

Talmud -- Kill the best of the goyim

cid:image085.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

A group of people around each other

Description generated with high confidence

The Lost Item of a Gentile: “If his intention is that he, and not the faith or Israel, should be praised, or because he loves the Gentile and has mercy on him, it is forbidden [to return the Gentile’s lost item]”)

 

Rabbis Say It’s OK to Kill Goyim: This is not science fiction people. This is not said by some anti-Semitic KKK or Neo-Nazis these are Rabbis saying it’s OK to kill non-Jews including children. I have found most of the most damning information about Jewish crimes comes from Jewish sources not so called anti-Semitic.

A person looking at the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html

 

cid:image010.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

 

Paul Bonacci was one of many children who were taken from Nebraska’s Boys Town foster care/adoption network, brought to the White House and savagely raped. In this video, Mr. Bonacci describes being taken from the White House with Nicholas and an unnamed boy. Paul and Nicholas were forced to rape the boy at gunpoint by the person who filmed the event. Later the unnamed child was sodomized by the person making the video until his anus bled, kicked repeatedly in the head and then shot to death – all after being raped in the White House by Ashkenazi/Jewish and non-Ashkenazi/Jewish politicians and corporate leaders. Also see https://youtu.be/8b61iIQCapY.

 

cid:image015.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

Editor’s Note:  Donald Gregg, National Security Advisor to George H.W. Bush was tasked with silencing those involved.  He turned to the CIA.   The Franklin Scandal was only one aspect of a much larger “call boy” operation moving children and teenagers, picked up from Boys Town, Catholic orphanages and off the streets, and housed in Washington and New York primarily.

A picture containing clothing

Description generated with high confidence

A person lying on a bed

Description generated with very high confidence

cid:image021.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

cid:image023.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

cid:image029.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

cid:image033.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

A vintage photo of a group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

A group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a newspaper

Description generated with high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a sign

Description generated with high confidence

A person holding a sign

Description generated with high confidence

A picture containing cake, text, birthday, newspaper

Description generated with very high confidence

A picture containing grass, outdoor, animal, ground

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a newspaper

Description generated with very high confidence

A group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

http://come-and-hear.com/editor/br_3.html

A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

cid:image098.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

 

A close up of a person smiling for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

 

A group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

Click on the two photos above to see video.

israel-white-slaveryweb

cid:image100.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

White Gentiles Women

Beautiful White Ladies Who Are Victims of Rape in Israel

Angelique Sabag Gautiller -- Israel's first female pimp

White Slave Trade

Israel’s first female pimp, Angelique Sabag Gautiller, Israel's first female pimp and one of many whore houses in Tel Aviv, Israel that Israeli pimps use to force beautiful, delicate White ladies from Russia and Slavic countries who have been tricked and lured with promises of respectable jobs in Israel and then forced to part with their virginity and gang raped every night by sexually perverted Israeli and Arab men.

Sex bar in the old central bus station area, Tel Aviv
These streets are crowded with sex bars, sex shops and sex parlors.

The old central bus station area, Tel Aviv, on the street with the most sex parlors.
Sometimes it's surprising to see who the customers are.

The old central bus station area (also called Neveh Sha'anan) is the red light district of Tel Aviv. Over the years, it became mostly populated with foreign and illegal workers. Several suicide bombing attacks have been carried out here during the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian confrontation. In the present, it is the worst place in Tel Aviv, a world of prostitution and drugs, with a high crime rate.
Who can rent here a cheap appartment or open up a shop, is considered lucky, since so many people sleep on the streets or in deserted buildings. They have no other place to go to.

At

sleeping_beauties_29

Ira, 23 - Her mother left Russia after the divorce, together with her two daughters, hoping for a better life in Israel. Ira started to take drugs, her mother gave up on her and doesn't let her in the house anymore, scared that her other daughter will take Ira's example. She lives now on the street and works as a prostitute. After a two-day-storm and heavy rain when she slept on the streets, despite all the hot tea and blankets, she was shivering the whole day at the shelter for prostitutes.

sleeping_beauties_20

sleeping_beauties_27

Jasmin waiting for clients on a Friday night.

·         How 11 New York City Babies Contracted Herpes Through - Health;

 

·         Baby Dies of Herpes Virus in Ritual Circumcision in NYC Orthodox ...;

 

·         Herpes cases among babies linked to ultra-Orthodox Jewish;

 

·         NYC, Orthodox Jews in talks over ritual after herpes cases - USA Today;

 

·         11 Babies Infected with Herpes in New York - Sandra Rose;

 

·         CDC: 11 infants contracted herpes due to controversial Jewish;

 

·         New York Baby Infected with Herpes After Metzitza B'peh;

 

·         New case of neonatal herpes caused by Jewish ... - New York Post;

 

·         Orthodox Rabbis Fight NYC's Effort to Warn Parents About Herpes ...

A picture containing indoor, person, baby

Description generated with very high confidence

A person standing in front of a crowd

Description generated with high confidence

A person holding a sign

Description generated with high confidence

A close up of a person

Description generated with high confidence

A picture containing person

Description generated with high confidence

A group of people looking at each other

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

Jewish Wisdom: What is a Goy?

 

Talmudic Jews 'Non-Jews Goyim Are Beasts to Serve Us as Slaves'

cid:image086.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850

 

One of his Assembly colleagues calls the apology "a beginning" but inadequate.

A person looking at the camera

Description generated with high confidence

Yair Netanyahu’s Night of Debauchery Revealed in Bombshell Recordings: Younger Netanyahu heard asking his friend, a gas tycoon's son, for NIS 400 for strippers, saying he owed him for $20 billion deal advanced by PM (click on photo to hear Yair audiotape)

A person looking at the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

“Rachel” (Vicki Polin) on Oprah Winfrey Show Discussing “Rachel’s” Ashkenazi Jewish Parents Introducing Her to Ashkenazi Jewish Ritual Murder and Rape of Children (click on photo to see Youtube video).

peckjewishslaves-tsr1_

cid:image113.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0

The Ashkenazi Jewish Slave Trade was not primarily for cheap labor. The race of the victims was used as an excuse to cover the real goal. The real reason for Ashkenazi-influenced enslavement of Africans (and all other people since) is demonic torture, sex and murder. The Babylonian Talmud advocates what the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Illnesses, Volume 5 describes as sexual sadism. Unless it is forcibly stopped, this group of people (including non-Ashkenazi members who have aligned themselves with Molech-worshiping members of the Ashkenazim) will not stop torturing, raping and killing. Like the demons who possess them, they are sex addicts. Without Jehovah-approved force, they will not stop. They will continue to use politics, race, financial issues and other irrelevant issues in the same manner that all junkies use excuses to hide their addiction. There are no political, religious, social or other irrelevant issues. They are snuff addicts. Unless they are stopped, they will continue to try to satiate an insatiable appetite for torture, deviant sex and murder – a parasitic appetite that, if left unchecked, will be the undoing of the entire human race. They are snuff addicts. Nothing more – nothing less.

Jew whipping slave[6]

Ashkenazi sexual sadist achieving climax by using a whip to rape a helpless human being to death.

Jews controlled African slavery

A close up of a person

Description generated with high confidence

A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

https://youtu.be/Mg_13WJ4gDo;

https://youtu.be/MtKBjPxGmyc

Jewish control over American slavery #2

JOWERS, FEDERAL AGENCIES FOUND LIABLE IN MURDERING DR. KING

Coretta Scott King, Martin Luther King, III, Bernice King, Dexter Scott King and Yolanda King, Plaintiffs, v. T.D. Loyd Jowers and Other Unknown Co-Conspirators, Defendants.

 

Slave  Sale by Levin

The Ringworm Children- dealings between the US and Israeli_Nazi governments

The Ringworm Children

Tzila Levine and the Ashkenazi who took her

Yemeni child stolen and given to Ashkenazi woman

Tziona Heiman and her biological Yemeni mother

Adult child with biological mother

Israel's Yemeni Baby Scandal

The Lavon Affair

Lavon Affair # 4

Deaths at U.S.S. Liberty

 

Injuries at U.S.S. Liberty

liberty_Main_Blast_Area

U.S.S. Liberty Attacks America

U.S.S. Liberty Gravesites

USS Liberty Crew

A picture containing text, newspaper

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a social media post

Description generated with very high confidence

A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

A screenshot of a cell phone

Description generated with very high confidence

A close up of a person

Description generated with high confidence

Israel Abuses Thai Workers

Thai workers in Israel

Israeli False Flag on France #2

Israeli False Flag on France #3

Israeli False Flag on France #4

MH17 -- Israel False Flag

Israel Celebrates Successful 9/11 Operation on Purim Holiday (click on photo to read article)

A group of people on a sidewalk

Description generated with high confidence

Israeli schoolchildren dressed up as the burning Twin Towers. Costume won best prize.

 

Countries that lost citizens on 9/11: http://brilliantmaps.com/9-11-victims;

 

Israel Did 9/11; Dr. Alan Sabrosky (click on photo to see Youtube video)

A person sitting in front of a television screen

Description generated with very high confidence

9/11 Alleged Hijackers Alive and Well (click on

photo to see Youtube video)

 

WTC Destruction of Building

WTC Falling Death4

WTC Falling Death2[3]

WTC Falling Death6

WTC Falling Death

WTC dead hand

Palestinians Killed and Scorned by Jews

Dead Palestinian Children

Palestinian Girl's Brains Blown Out

Palestinian child with guts blown out

Palestinian Princess 3

Palestinian Victime of Jew Kidney Grubbing

Israelis using pepper spray against Palestinians

Ethiopian Women and Depo Provera

Haaretz Story of Ethiopian Women Given Depo Provera

Mike Peled

Rosenbaum-organ-trafficking

Israel-Islamic State Trafficking in Body Parts

From Israel with Kidney

Israeli Kidney Network Busted in Ukraine

Israel Kidney Scandal in UkraineScreen-shot-2012-03-18-at-12.56.25-PM

Israel Steals Kidneys from HaitiEthiopians Go Back to Africa
Baltimore Is Here
Israelizing the Police


cid:247A1ABBA41049E8B4F3AD2FA8DCBACA@CherylHomeOfficeComputer
Amadou Diallo -- 41 Shots

Freddie Gray

Freddie Gray dragged (2)

Freddie Gray in Hospital

funeral-freddie-gray

Sean Bell 50 Shots

Sean Bell Funeral

Rodney King and Police Assault

Eric Garner Alive with Daughter

Eric Garner Chokehold

Eric Garner Dead

Eric Garner Funeral

NYC Settles Garner Death for 5.9 Million

State Trooper who saw Tawana

Nurse who interviewed Tawana

Tawana Brawley in Hospital

Tawana Crying

C._Vernon_Mason (2)

cid:image128.jpg@01D33D6E.244AB8D0

 

 

The Crimes of Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere

A picture containing wall, indoor, person, light

Description generated with very high confidence

“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah.”

שְׁמַע,יִשְׂרָאֵל: יְהוָהאֱלֹהֵינוּ,יְהוָהאֶחָד

 

            “Jehovah went on speaking to Moses, saying: “…’Any man of Israel and any foreigner who resides in Israel who gives any of his offspring to Molech should be put to death without fail…I myself will set my face against that man, and I will cut him off from among his people, because he has given some of his offspring to Molech and has defiled my holy place and has profaned my holy name. If the people of the land should deliberately close their eyes to what that man does when he gives his offspring to Molech and they do not put him to death, then I myself will certainly set my face against that man and his family. I will cut off that man from his people along with all who join him in prostituting themselves to Molech.

Talmud -- Kill the best of the goyimJew whipping slave[6]cid:image113.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0cid:image023.jpg@01D3943D.12028FB0A person lying on a bed

Description generated with very high confidenceA picture containing cake, text, birthday, newspaper

Description generated with very high confidenceA group of people posing for a photo

Description generated with very high confidence

cid:image100.jpg@01D2D940.D7866850A group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidenceA person looking at the camera

Description generated with very high confidenceA group of people on a sidewalk

Description generated with high confidenceA picture containing indoor, person, baby

Description generated with very high confidenceA close up of a person

Description generated with high confidenceA group of people posing for the camera

Description generated with very high confidence

A person wearing a hat

Description generated with very high confidence

Rabbi Moses Maimonides (RamBam), Guide to the Perplexed: “[T]he Negroes found in the remote South, and those who resemble them from among them that are with us in these climes. The status of those is like that of irrational animals. To my mind they do not have the rank of men but have among the beings a rank lower than the rank of man but higher than the rank of apes. For they have the external shape and lineaments of a man and a faculty of discernment that is superior to that of the apes. (https://www.sefaria.org/Guide_for_the_Perplexed%2C_Part_3.51?lang=bi)

The prohibition to hate applies only to Jews; one may hate a Gentile (http://www.come-and-hear.com/supplement/so-daat-emet/index.html;

 

http://www.come-and-hear.com/supplement/so-daat-emet/en_gentiles4.html#f3): M. You Shall Not Hate: It is written in the Torah (Leviticus 19:17): "You shall not hate your brother in your heart. You shall certainly rebuke your neighbor, and not suffer sin on his account" -- so it is clearly stated in the Torah that this prohibition specifically regards Jews. And so, Maimonides wrote in The Laws of Mental States, chapter 6, halacha 6 (in the printed edition, halacha 5): "Anyone who hates a Jew in his heart transgresses a negative commandment, as it says: 'You shall not hate your brother in your heart'." Thus, he also wrote in Sefer HaMitzvot, negative commandment 302, and likewise it appears in Sefer HaChinuch, commandment 245 (in other editions 238).

 

One may take revenge against or bear a grudge towards Gentiles; likewise, the commandment "love your neighbor" applies only to Jews, not to Gentiles.:  N. You Shall Not Avenge or Bear a Grudge -- And You Shall Love Your Neighbor as Yourself: It is written in the Torah (Leviticus 19:18): "You shall not avenge, nor bear any grudge against the children of your people, but you shall love your neighbor as yourself: I am the Lord" -- here also the verse yells out "the children of your people." In Torat Cohanim on the portion of Kedoshim, chapter 4, halacha 12: "You shall not avenge nor bear a grudge against the children of your people -- but you can avenge and bear a grudge against others" (that is, against Gentiles -- explanation of the Ra'avad ..." In chapter 6 of The Laws of Mental States, halacha 4 (in the printed edition, halacha 3): "It is a commandment for every person to love each and every Jew as he loves himself, as it says: 'You shall love your neighbor as yourself'."

 

 

 

http://www.ottmall.com/mj_ht_arch/v15/mj_v15i20.html#CDX

 

 

 

Artsot Ha-Hayyim: In 1992 a book was published by a leading member of the Satmar community entitled Artsot Ha-Hayyim. On p. 52 he explains, and quotes other rabbis, that the reason Abraham Lincoln was killed was because he freed the blacks. this is also the reason why Kennedy was killed, i.e. because he was good to the blacks. He continues by saying that this will be the fate of any who adopt a progressive attitude towards blacks, because they are meant to be enslaved. His source for this is Ham's curse.

Babylonian Talmud, Tractate Sanhedrin, Folio p. 745, 108b: "Our Rabbis taught: Three copulated in the ark, and they were all punished - the dog, the raven and Ham. The dog was doomed to be tied, the raven expectorates [his seed into his mate's mouth], and Ham was smitten in his skin." (This is footnoted, and the footnote reads: "I.e., from him was descended Cush (the negro), who is black-skinned."

 

 

Midrash Rabbah (Soncino) Vol. 1, p. 293: "AND HE SAID: CURSED BE CANAAN (Breishit 9:25): (Commentary omitted) ...R. Huna also said in R. Joseph's name: You [i.e. Noah is speaking to Ham) have prevented me from doing something in the dark [i.e. cohabiting with his wife], therefore your seed will be ugly and dark-skinned. R. Chiyya said: Ham and the dog copulated in the Ark, therefore Ham came forth black-skinned while the dog publicly exposed its copulation."

Legends of the Jews; The Curse of Drunkenness: The descendants of Ham through Canaan therefore have red eyes, because Ham looked upon the nakedness of his father; they have misshapen lips, because Ham spoke with his lips to his brothers about the unseemly condition of his father; they have twisted curly hair… The last will and testament of Canaan addressed to his children read as follows: "Speak not the truth; hold not yourselves aloof from theft; lead a dissolute life; hate your master with an exceeding great hate; and love one another."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHERYL D. UZAMERE, SUI JURIS

APPEARING PRO SE

Cheryl D. Uzamere

1209 Loring Avenue

Apt. 6B

Brooklyn, NY 11208

Tel.: (347) 255-3922

Fax: (718) 210-2750

E-mail: cuzamere@netzero.net

 

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

 

 

 

 

CHERYL D. UZAMERE, appearing on Her Own Behalf and on Behalf of Her Children DAVID PAUL WALKER and TARA ANN UZAMERE as Victims of the Babylonian Talmud-Fomented Human Trafficking for the Sex Trade

 

                                    Plaintiffs,

 

            - vs. -

 

NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY AND AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF THE NEW YORK CITY HOUSING AUTHORITY;

 

UNNAMED BABYLONIAN TALMUD-ADHERENT ASHKENAZI JEWISH LEADERS AND BABYLONIAN-TALMUD JUDAISM AS A HATE GROUP UNDER THE FIGHTING WORDS DOCTRINE;

 

DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE AND AS YET UNNAMED MEMBERS OF THE DEMOCRATIC NATIONAL COMMITTEE;

 

STATE OF NEW YORK; NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF TEMPORARY AND DISABILITY ADMINISTRATION; AND AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF AGENCIES OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

 

CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK CITY HUMAN RESOURCES ADMINISTRATION; NEW YORK CITY ADMINISTRATION FOR CHILDREN’S SERVICES; MARCIA E. WERCHOL, ASSISTANT VICE PRESIDENT FOR THE NEW CITY HEALTH AND HOSPITAL CORPORATION; AND AS

 

Case No. ______________________

 

VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF AND DAMAGES:

 

·         Civil Action for Rico/Racketeering and Conspiracy to Engage in a Pattern of Racketeering Activity (pursuant to Chevron Corp. v. Donziger);

 

·         Civil Action for Deprivation of Rights (First Amendment, Fifth Amendment (blacklisting) and Fourteenth Amendment; Americans with Disabilities Act, Americans With Disabilities Act, The Rehabilitation Act of 1973, The Fair Housing Amendments Act of 1988 (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §3604, Title VII of the Civil Rights Law of 1964, and the New York State Human Rights Law);

 

·         Implied Cause of Action/Bivens as to Federal Employees (Not Federal Agencies)

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF AGENCIES OF THE CITY OF NEW YORK NEW YORK CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT AND AS YET UNNAMED LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS OF THE NEW YORK POLICE DEPARTMENT

 

NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION; HOWARD BRUCE FRIEDMAN, GENERAL COUNSEL, NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION;

 

AS YET UNNAMED LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENTS OF THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY;

 

JEFFREY BURSTEIN, REGIONAL DIRECTOR OF THE EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION;

 

AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF THE NATIONAL CREDIT UNION ADMINISTRATION;

 

AFFINITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION AND AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF AFFINITY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION;

 

METAVANTE CORPORATION AND AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF METAVANTE CORPORATION;

 

VERIZON, INC. AND AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF VERIZON, INC.

 

ALTICE USA, INC. AND AS YET UNNAMED EMPLOYEES OF ALTICE, USA. INC.;

TRONC, THE DAILY NEWS,

 

DISABILITY RIGHTS OF NEW YORK; CLIFF ZUCKER INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, DISABILITY RIGHTS OF NEW YORK;

 

VARIOUS NON-GOVERNMENTAL AND NOT-FOR-PROFIT CORPORATIONS CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITHIN NEW YORK STATE

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA; EHIGIE EDOBOR UZAMERE, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN IS FORMER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS SENATOR FOR THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF NIGERIA

AMERICAN ARBITRATION ASSOCIATION; VARIOUS CORPORATIONS CONDUCTING BUSINESS WITHIN NEW YORK STATE

 

 

            Cheryl D. Uzamere, the Plaintiff in the above entitled action, is a practicing Christian and a servant of Jehovah and a member of the Jehovah’s Witness sect, the Most High God, God of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Jesus Christ. The Plaintiff is disabled pursuant to the Americans with Disabilities Act. She is the mother of David Paul Walker and Tara Ann Uzamere, children who were victims of terrorism by Defendants New York State and New York City’s Babylonian Talmud-based foster care system, who were trafficked by Defendants State of New York and City of New York for purposes of the Babylonian Talmud-fomented trafficking of humans for the sex trade. The Plaintiff is an individual against whom the extrajudicial sentence of death has been ordered pursuant to Babylonian Talmudic law regarding the practice of Christianity and the religious crime of meshira/mesira (whistleblowing).

            Based on those matters in which Plaintiff was personally involved, and on information and belief as to all other matters, the Plaintiff makes the following statements under penalty of perjury:

STATEMENT OF MY SON, DAVID PAUL WALKER’S SEXUAL ABUSE

WHILE A CLIENT AT JCCA-EDENWALD GROUP HOME

 

            1)         The Plaintiff became aware of the incident described below sometime during 2018. The Plaintiff’s son, David Paul Walker described an occasion where, while he was six years old, he was in a setting where the employees of JCCA-Edenwald did not supervise the sleeping area, nor provide security cameras or security guards to ensure that the Plaintiff’s son’s or other foster children were safe:

Please Mr. Don’t touch me there, I’m only six…love you not, hate you a lot, Shall we commence to crucifix???...

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

When I was a little boy, teenage boy masturbated in front of me, then politely ask me to lick???... “If you come near me, I’ll scream”, First time seeing someone else’s dick…So easy to pass judgment, tell everybody else what to do…Say stranger, my advice but your ass, shall we suffer together for a spell or two???

 

Disturbed by the vacant lifeless expression in my eyes yes???...Systematic rape of my soul…prolonged torture of my mind, please my darling. I wholeheartedly invite you to try your best…”

 

AFFIDAVIT OF MY DAUGHTER, TARA ANN UZAMERE THAT WAS IGNORED BY NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT JUSTICE JEFFREY S. SUNSHINE

 

            2)         The Plaintiff daughter, Tara Ann Uzamere, now a registered nurse with the State of New York for over 10 years, submitted New York State-notarized Affidavit in which she described Defendant Ehigie Edobor Uzamere, at that time a senator for the Federal Republic of Nigeria, her father:

            I, Tara A. Uzamere, being duly sworn, depose and say that:

 

            1)         I am the daughter of the Plaintiff and the Defendant in the above entitled action...

 

            2)         I make this Affidavit based on the following facts:

 

            3)         That the Plaintiff has always told me that Defendant is my father ever since I was a child.

 

            4)         That I met the Defendant for the first time at JFK Airport in Jamaica, New York around the year 2004 to the best of my recollection.

 

            5)         That I took a photograph of the Defendant during the aforesaid visit. Photograph taken at JFK Airport is hereby attached as Exhibit A.

 

            6)         That on the day that I first met the Defendant at JFK Airport, I called my friend Eusi Patterson on the cell phone that I used to take a photograph of the Defendant.

 

            7)         That on the aforesaid day the Defendant openly and notoriously introduced himself to Eusi as my father.

 

            8)         That I met and visited the Defendant's late brother, John Uzamere at 476 Amboy Street.

 

            9)         That the Defendant and his brother George Uzamere openly and notoriously visited me when I lived at 489 Ray Street, Freeport, New York.

 

            10)       That while I was a resident in Freeport, New York, I experienced a car accident, and that George Uzamere and the Defendant openly and notoriously sent checks to pay the rest of my car note to Drive Financial, a financing company based in Dallas, Texas.

 

            11)       That the Defendant openly and notoriously visited me when I lived at Nichol Road in Wyandanch, New York.

 

            12)       That the Defendant met my landlord, Martin Marta when the Defendant visited me while I was living at the aforesaid address.

 

.

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

            13)       That during the aforesaid meeting the Defendant openly and notoriously identified himself to my landlord as my father.

 

            14)       That I spoke with Wellington Uzamere on the telephone several times before and after I first met the Defendant.

 

            15)       That Wellington Uzamere referred to the Defendant as "Ehigie."

 

            16)       That based on information received from members of the Edo/Bini community as well as my own belief, my facial structure resembles that of the Defendant as evidenced in my photograph hereby attached as Exhibit B.

 

            17)       That while I spend three or four pleasant occasions with the Defendant and received monetary gifts during those occasions, the Defendant has never been a consistent part of my life as I explained in the report [that] I provided to Nigerian newspaper Huhu Online. See aforesaid report hereby attached as Exhibit C.

 

            18)       That based on what I learned at Long Island College School of Nursing regarding psychiatric nursing and psychiatric illnesses, as well as personal day-to-day observation of the Plaintiff, that while the Plaintiffs predominate affect is consistent with what I believe to be hypomania, the Plaintiff is not psychotic and does not require hospitalization, as untruthfully implied by Eugene Uzamere's defamatory characterization of the Plaintiff as "certifiably insane" to Nigerian newspaper Point Blank News Online, hereby attached as Exhibit D.

 

            19)       That before 2004 the Defendant never visited me; never celebrated a birthday with me; never kissed me; never told me he loved me; never wiped away my tears; never talked to me about God; never attended a house of God with me; never read me a Bible story; never talked to me about how to comport myself around men or the importance of being a chaste woman; never let other men know that I was precious to him; never let other men know that they would be responsible to him if they hurt me; never held my hand; never walked with me; never sat me on his lap; never played games with me; never took me to the movies; never picked me up; never gave me a hug; never attended a school meeting with my teachers; never visited me in the hospital; never told me he was proud of me; never accompanied me to a father-daughter dance, never attended a graduation; never invited other members of the Edo/Bini community to a naming ceremony in honor of my birth; never told me that he was glad I was born and never treated me like he loved me and wanted to protect me from the dangers of the world the way normal fathers do with their daughters, and especially in the manner that Nigerian men are known to treat their children.

 

            20)       That the falsely concocted "counter-affidavit" and the falsely concocted affirmation by Eugene Uzamere makes me feel heartsick because I have always been made to believe by the Plaintiff, the Defendant and members of the Defendant's family that the Defendant is my father and that being a blood member of the Uzamere clan, a blood member of the proud and ancient Edo/Bini nation and culture and being a native Nigerian based on consanguinity are my birthrights and a part of who I am; that the aforesaid "counter-affidavit- and attorney's affirmation are emotionally and psychologically abusive as they suggest that I am a bastard child while the Defendant is not willing to end the question of paternity by taking a simple DNA test.

 

            21)       That I now experience financial difficulties such that I do not have money to return to college to continue studying nursing, and that because of the Plaintiffs advanced age and disability, it is very difficult for her to obtain employment to help me pay for college; PELL grant rejection information is attached at Exhibit E.

 

            22)       That I am willing to submit myself for honest DNA testing to confirm that the Defendant is my father if conditions can be controlled so that the Defendant does not know and cannot access the location of the laboratory where said DNA test is performed so that the Defendant does not unduly influence anyone to lie about the results of the DNA test as it seems the Defendant was able to do on the marriage affidavit where the municipal clerk signed his/her name to indicate that he/she verified the Defendant's

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

age, but that on inspection of said page, did not mark off any box to indicate the type of identification the municipal clerk used to verify the Defendants age and date of birth and identity; see Plaintiff's Affidavit and Application for License to Marry, top of back page hereby attached as Exhibit F.

 

            WHEREFORE, as the Defendant has forced the Plaintiff and I to suffer domestic violence as identified by the U.S. Justice Department's Office of Violence Against Women, I respectfully ask that this Court considers that the Plaintiff is not just pleading for herself but for our entire family; that this Court grant the Plaintiffs lawful and just request to dismiss attorney Eugene Uzamere's falsified affirmation in its entirety, and to grant the Plaintiff's motion for default judgment and money judgment in its entirety.

INTRODUCTION

3)         The primary cause of this action is a widespread criminal enterprise engaged in a pattern of racketeering activity across State lines, and a conspiracy to engage in racketeering activity involving numerous RICO predicate acts during the past ten (10) calendar years.

4)         The Plaintiff alleges that the predicate acts alleged here cluster around Defendants’ violation of the Plaintiff’s and her children’s First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Every act committed by the Defendants was designed to and to continue to inflict severe and sustained economic hardship upon Plaintiff, with the intent of violating the Plaintiff’s and her children’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and to petition the government for a redress of grievances by impairing, obstructing, preventing and discouraging Plaintiff from writing about the crimes that were and are still being committed against Plaintiff and her children by the Defendants; and by disabling and/or destroying Plaintiff’s website, http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net that has recorded the Defendants’ criminal acts against the Plaintiff and her children since 2008.

            5)         This is a complex civil action for RICO remedies authorized by the federal statutes at 18 U.S.C. 1961 et seq.; for declaratory and injunctive relief; for actual, consequential and exemplary damages; and for all other relief which this honorable District Court deems just and proper under all circumstances which have occasioned this Verified Complaint.  See 18 U.S.C. §§1964(a) and (c) (“Civil RICO”).

            6)         Plaintiff brings this action pursuant to 42 USC §1983 for violations of civil rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

            7)         The Plaintiff’s civil action for RICO is also based in the Second Circuit Court of Appeal’s interpretation and adjudication of the case, Chevron Corp. v. Donziger, which author Anna Hanke’s article entitled Equitable Relief for Private RICO Plaintiffs: Using Donziger to Remedy Courthouse Corruption states:

…the Second Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the judgment of the District Court for the Southern District of New York in Chevron Corp. v. Steven Donziger ("Donziger"). This decision granted Chevron an equitable remedy under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations ("RICO") Act, and the injunction prevented forty-eight injured Ecuadorean plaintiffs (the “Lago Agrio plaintiffs,” or “LAPs”), represented by Donziger, from enforcing their $8.646 billion judgment granted in Ecuadorean court…The United States Department of Justice has frequently used the RICO Act to fight racketeering since it was enacted, but Donziger was the first time that the Second Circuit had decided the issue of whether a private individual or corporation, as opposed to a government agency, could receive equitable relief as a plaintiff in a RICO case.

 

            8)         The Plaintiff alleges that the predicate acts alleged here cluster around Defendants’ violation of the Plaintiff’s and her children’s First Amendment rights free speech and to petition the government for a redress of grievances. Every act committed by the Defendants was designed to and to continue to inflict severe and sustained economic hardship upon Plaintiff, with the intent of violating the Plaintiff’s and her children’s First Amendment rights to freedom of speech and to petition the government for a redress of grievances by impairing, obstructing, preventing and discouraging Plaintiff from writing and publishing information on the internet and elsewhere regarding crimes that were and are still being committed against the Plaintiff and her children.

            9)         The predicate acts associated with RICO to which the Plaintiff refers include: 1) 18 U.S. Code §1201, kidnapping; 2) 18 USC §1028 (relating to fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents); 3) 18 USC §1344 (relating to financial institution fraud); 4) 18 USC §1503 (relating to obstruction of justice, including malicious prosecution based on Defendant U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s named employees misuse of the federal court system by commencing actions in federal court that were dismissed against the Plaintiff in their entirety); 5) 18 USC §1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement); 7) 18 USC §1512 (relating to tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant); 8) 18 USC §1513 (relating to retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant; 9) 18 USC §1543 (relating to forgery or false use of passport); 10) 18 USC

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

18 USC §1581–1592 (relating to peonage, slavery, and trafficking); 18 USC §1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery, or extortion); 18 USC §2251, 2251A, 2252, and 2260 (relating to sexual exploitation of children); any act which is indictable under the Immigration and Nationality Act; and any act that is indictable under any provision listed in section 2332b(g)(5)(B) (civil action for violation of the Antiterrorism Act).

10)       Other predicate acts, although appearing to be isolated events were part of the overall conspiracy and pattern of racketeering activity alleged herein rise to the level of violations of 42 USC §1983.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

            11)       Plaintiffs bring this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §1983 for violations of civil rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

            12)       The case presents a federal question within this Court's jurisdiction under Article III, §2 of the United States Constitution and 28 U.S.C. §§1331 and 1343.

            13)       Declaratory relief is authorized by 28 U.S.C. §§2201 and 2202.

            14)       This court has original jurisdiction pursuant to the civil RICO remedies at 18 USC §1964, and the holdings of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit in Chevron Corp. v. Donziger, 833. F.3d.

            15)       This court has original jurisdiction pursuant to Doe v. New York City Dep't of Soc. Servs., 709 F.2d 782 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 464 U.S. 864, 104 S. Ct. 195, 78 L. Ed. 2d 171 (1983); Doe v. New York City Dep't of Soc. Servs., 649 F.2d 134 (2d Cir. 1981).

            16)       Plaintiff also brings this action pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics and 42 USC §1983 for violations of civil rights under the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution by federal employees.

PROCEDURAL HISTORY

            17)       Within the statutory meaning of RICO as established by 18 USC §1961, adjudicated by this court in the case Chevron Corp. v. Donziger and later affirmed by the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, there were several acts of malicious prosecution

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

that were initiated at the behest of the Defendants who are members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish leadership in positions of great power who are ensconced within governmental and corporate areas:

                   i.            Uzamere v. Uzamere, K-26332-07 (divorce action, please refer to Justice Sunshine’s decisions dated January 12, 2009 and May 12, 2009 which ignored the notarized affidavit of Plaintiff’s daughter Tara A. Uzamere, but gave credence to the unauthenticated foreign counter-affidavit of Plaintiff’s husband former Nigerian Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere pretending to be “Godwin Uzamere” for which he was never arrested. Plaintiff alleges that the divorce was never completed; she was publicly outed as a “wacko” anti-Semite by the New York Daily News, arrested, placed in a mental institution but never received reasonable accommodations based on being a “wacko” during the entire divorce proceeding which was not completed. More than 10 years later, the Plaintiff has never received any documentation confirming the finalization of the marriage and alleges that she is still married to former Nigerian Senator Ehigie Edobor Uzamere.

 

                 ii.            United States of America v. Cheryl D. Uzamere, 1:08-cr-00114-jgm, filed September 25, 2008; December 11, 2008.

 

               iii.            People v. Cheryl Uzamere, 2009KN087992, filed November 3, 2009, Dismissed: December 3, 2009.

 

               iv.            U.S. Department of Homeland Security’s commencement in a criminal investigation turned into interference in the Plaintiff’s psychiatric treatment pursuant to a falsified by a National Security letter, dated August 18, 2011 in which the Plaintiff was falsely accused of making threats to the Center for Medicare and Medicaid call center (http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net/audio_files/conversationwithcms1.mp3, advance to 24:30 minutes to hear CMS worker say that the Plaintiff never threatened anyone).

 

                v.            United States of American v. Cheryl D. Uzamere, USDC Violation Nos. 6185447, 6185448 (6185447 was deemed too insufficient to prosecute); Filed: Dismissed: April 3, 2018.

 

            18)       On December 19, 2017, in response to Plaintiff’s complaint to the Social Security Administration that Defendants New York City Housing Authority, Affinity Federal Credit Union and Metavante Corporation embezzled Plaintiff’s SSDI funds, U.S.D.C. Summons Nos. 6185447 and 6185448 charges were filed against the Plaintiff for which she was required to appear at the United States Court for the Eastern District of New York in response (6185447 was deemed too insufficient to prosecute).

            19)       On March 12, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the Government’s criminal violations, submitted a complaint to the U.S.

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

Department of Justice’s Disability Right Section against all judges of the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of New York.

            20)       On March 27, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the Government’s criminal violations, submitted a motion demanding the recusal of all judges of the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of New York.

            21)       On March 27, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the Government’s criminal violations, submitted her demand for discovery and inspection government records, in which she requested the “CCTV/surveillance camera records of my activities with the Social Security Administration’s office at 3386 Crescent Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11208 that were reported between December 19, 2017 to the present.

            22)       On March 31, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in response to the Government’s criminal violations, submitted her amended demand for discovery and inspection government records, in which she requested the “CCTV/surveillance camera records of my activities with the Social Security Administration’s office at 3386 Crescent Avenue, Brooklyn, New York, 11208 that were reported between December 19, 2017 to the present.

            23)       On March 31, 2018, the Plaintiff, having been denied reasonable accommodations based on her having a serious mental illness recognized by the Americans with Disabilities Act, and having been assigned an attorney who prepared no answer in

response to the Government’s criminal violations, submitted her motion to dismiss the Government’s criminal action for failure to state a cognizable offense.

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

          24)          On April 3, 2018, the Government dismissed U.S.D.C. Violation No. 6185448 against the Plaintiff.

          25)          From the time that the Plaintiff submitted her demands for discovery and inspection of the Government’s records until the present, the Defendants who are members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi Jewish leadership have influenced the Government to refuse to respond to Plaintiff’s requests for discovery and inspection of their records.

            26)       Since the dismissal of the last maliciously-prosecuted criminal action at the behest of Defendants who are members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent, Ashkenazi Jewish leadership ensconced in positions of great power within governmental and corporate areas, there have been other acts of obstruction that continue up to the filing of this Verified Complaint, including Defendant New York City Police Department’s constant banning of the Plaintiff from public places while filing no criminal charges or providing any written notice of any ban, based on what the Plaintiff alleges is Defendant members of Babylonian Talmud-adherent Ashkenazi Jewish leadership’s last-ditch effort to deprive the Plaintiff of her First Amendment rights to free speech and to petition the government for a redress of grievances by having Defendant New York City Police Department’s officers “legally” murder the Plaintiff without due process based on her violation of it arbitrary ban from public places to surreptitiously enforce the spirit of the law associated with New York State Executive Order No. 157 and New York State Legislative Sessions law (2017-2018) banning the boycott of Israel or territories under Israel’s control.

            27)       The Plaintiff alleges that the enforcement of  New York State Executive Order No. 157 and it legislative counterpart, New York State Legislative Sessions Law No. 2942—A are extension of the Babylonian Talmudic doctrine Law of Moser, explained by Rabbi Michael J. Broyde at the website http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/moser-broyde/index.html:

Even though Jewish law expects people to observe the laws of the land, and even imposes that obligation as a religious duty, the Talmud recounts - in a number of places - that it is prohibited to inform on Jews to the secular government, even when their conduct is a violation of secular law and even when their conduct is a violation of Jewish law. While there are a number of exceptions to this prohibition (which are explained further in this

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

section), the essential halacha was that Jewish law prohibits such informing absent specific circumstances. Even is secular government were to incorporate substantive Jewish law into secular law and punish violations of what is, in effect, Jewish law, Jews would still be prohibited from cooperating with such a system. Indeed, classical Jewish law treats a person who frequently informs on others as a pursuer (a rodef) who may be killed to prevent him from informing, even without a formal court ruling (please refer to Youtube videos https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdH6vRcN7qE and https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p8D4cVnnIU.

 

            28)       The Plaintiff further alleges that the primary purpose for the promulgation of Defendant New York State’s Israel anti-boycott laws is to facilitate kifala/employer-sponsored employment (now banned virtually banned all over the world); the transporting of poor children in Defendant New York State foster care system; the funding of not-for-profit organizations that receive funding to help individuals in various forms of distress and other political, social, and religious programs that are fronts for the Babylonian Talmud-sanctioned trafficking of children for the sex trade:

Come and Hear, Sex with Children by Talmud Rules (http://www.come-and-hear.com/editor/america_2.html):

 

Talmud Permits Child-Adult Sex

 

Talmud law permits sexual intercourse between children and adults. This doctrine is contained in a number of Mishnahs

 

Again, there is no prohibition of a sexual practice that would almost certainly cause physical damage to a young girl due to the mismatched sizes of genitals between an adult's penis and a child's vagina or anus…

 

We have seen in Numbers 31:12-18 that Moses permitted grown men to use little girls as concubines. In the Talmud, grown men are permitted to have sexual intercourse with female babies and children, and homosexual relations with boys younger than nine.

 

            29)       The Plaintiff has filed several lawsuits in the past and is familiar with the difficulty that federal district courts have experienced based on Plaintiff’s inartfully drawn complaints.  The Plaintiff is also familiar with her rights as they pertain to Haines v. Kerner, et al, 404 U.S. 519 (1972); however, in an effort not to misuse those rights associated with the filing of lawsuits by individuals proceeding on their own behalf, and to ensure that this honorable Court’s patience is not overly taxed, the Plaintiff has attempted to borrow the verbiage of precedent-setting cases associated with the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. The Plaintiff also employs persuasive argument by borrowing the verbiage of precedent-setting cases for which enforcement is specific to the circuits in which the

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

respective Courts of Appeals have rendered decisions; however, the Plaintiff assures this Court that while the enforcement of precedent-setting cases decided by other Courts of Appeals are persuasive authority in this Circuit, U.S. Supreme Court case law, and the federal statutes on which other Courts of Appeals (especially in the case of Jordahl v. Brnovich, No. 18-16896, have rendered precedent-setting decisions are mandatory authority.

STATEMENT OF FACTS

New York State’s Israel Anti-Boycott Law

            30)       On January 13, 2017, the New York State Legislature amended the state finance law and the retirement and social security law, in relation to purchasing restrictions (“the Act”). The Act provides, in relevant part:

Section 1. The state finance law is amended by adding a new section 165-b. As used in this section, the following definitions apply:

 

"Boycott" shall mean to engage in, promote, or encourage any activity that will result in any person to abstain from commercial, social or political relations with any allied nation, companies based in allied nations, or territories controlled by an allied nation with the intent to penalize, inflict or cause harm to an allied nation, its people or its commercial products.

 

"Person" shall mean any natural person, corporation, limited liability company, unincorporated association or any nongovernmental entity, organization or group.

 

2942—A: Contracting; procurement; investment; prohibitions:

 

2. (B) not later than ninety days after the effective date of this section, and then annually thereafter, the commissioner shall develop and publish, using credible information available to the public, a list of persons determined by the commissioner, that have engaged in the boycotting of any allied nation. The commissioner shall not include any person on the list required to be so developed and published if the commissioner determines that such person engaging in boycotting an allied nation, engaged in such boycotting in order to comply with a provision of law of an allied nation in which such person resides or conducts business operations. Such list, when developed and published, shall be posted on the website of the office of general services.

 

3. (A) “a State agency shall require all persons that submit a bid or offer in response to a notice of procurement, or that propose to renew an existing procurement contract, or that propose to assume the responsibility of a contractor pursuant to a procurement contract, or otherwise propose to enter into a contract with a state agency with respect to a contract for commodities, services, construction, or contracts entered into pursuant to section eight of the public buildings law or section thirty-eight of the highway law, to certify, at the time the bid is submitted, or the contract is renewed or assigned, that the person or the assignee is not identified on the list developed and published pursuant to paragraph (B) of subdivision two of this section, and all state agencies shall include such certification information in the procurement record.

 

(B) all persons that submit a bid or offer in response to a notice of procurement, or that propose to renew an existing procurement contract with a state agency, or that propose to assume the responsibility of a contractor pursuant to a procurement contract with a state agency, or otherwise propose to enter into a contract with a state agency with respect

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

 

 

 

to a contract for commodities, services, construction, or contracts entered into pursuant to section eight of the public buildings law or section thirty-eight of the highway law, shall certify that they have not boycotted any allied nations, and that they are not identified on the developed and published pursuant to paragraph (B) of subdivision Two of this section.

 

            31)       The Plaintiff alleges that superficially, the Act seeks to suppress participation in political boycott campaigns aimed at Israel and/or territories controlled by Israel, particularly Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (“BDS”) campaigns.  These campaigns seek to apply economic pressure on Israel to protest the Israeli government’s treatment of Palestinians and occupation of the Palestinian territories.

            32)       New York State’s Executive Order No. 157 directing state agencies and authorities to divest public funds state, inter alia:

·         the State of Israel is a critical and invaluable ally of the United States;

 

·         the State of New York and Israel enjoy a special historical relationship and share a commonly forged cultural bond;

 

·         the State of New York does not support boycott related tactics that are used to threaten the sovereignty and security of allies and trade partners of the United States;

 

·         in 2005, elements of Palestinian civil society issued a call for a Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaign against Israel, coordinated by the Palestinian BDS National Committee;

 

·         the State of New York unequivocally rejects the BDS campaign and stands firmly with Israel;

 

·         the State of New York will not permit its own investment activity to further the BDS campaign in any way, shape or form, whether directly or indirectly.

 

The Plaintiff’s Boycott Participation

            33)       The Plaintiff was raised as one of Jehovah’s Witnesses, and as such, believes that there is no form of human government that can sufficiently satisfy humans’ physical and spiritual needs outside of Jehovah’s will, and that other religions that profess to obey Jehovah are false  The Plaintiff further believes that Israel at one point, had a covenant relationship with Jehovah God, but violated that covenant based on Israel’s worship of the God Molech, which included the sacrificing of children by burning them to death.

 

 

 

 

 

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

 

 

 

            34)       The Plaintiff has no formal involvement with boycotting Israel; however, the Plaintiff’s website http://www.thecrimesofsenatoruzamere.net makes it clear that the Plaintiff disagrees with Israel, and its use of the Babylonian Talmud to advance dogma that violates Jehovah’s righteous laws: